[Hostage]

This is for those that can't quite digest all the legal happenings that are trying to save our President's landslide victory on November 3.

[ShadowAce]

The problem with this analogy is that Texas is not suing the auctioneer (Electoral College). Texas is suing the competitor. Still the right thing to do.

[Liz]

Very few of the lawsuits Trump’s legal team filed since Election Day have really worried the left,
but when Texas AG Ken Paxton filed directly with the USSC Monday, lefties immediately began freaking out.
They are alarmed because even they understand that Paxton’s suit has the potential to flip the election.

---

ANALYSIS Not having President Trump being the aggrieved party, only the states who followed their laws, is a genius move.

Texas is even disregarding the obvious fraud in the early results there, in this case.

Equal protection without accoutrements is the way to go. (h/t Ingtar)

[RWGinger]

Thank you
I am in Texas and did nit quite understand
Just proud we did it
And proud of the other 9 states, so far.

[Repeal The 17th]

Houston Astros 2019...

[FreedBird]

The Supreme Court should referee the steal. If there was violation of the U.S. Constitution, the election was not legal in many cases. Is it simply a coincidence, all the problems of fraud are in the battleground states? This fraud had to be orchestrated, supported with big money and hostile foreign countries.

[BobL]

Regarding the cheating lawsuits, I read a good analogy:

A person is arrested for murder. The DA and the Defense show up in court for their Preliminary Hearing. The judge states: “I haven’t seen any evidence showing this man committed murder, case dismissed!”

[PerConPat]

btt

[Vaduz]

Looks to be the last nail in the democrats coffin body parts found all over the place.

The U.S. Constitution isn’t their crossword puzzle where you can fill in any word you like to make it fit.

[who_would_fardels_bear]

I think it is also important that it is States that are the plaintiffs. If the plaintiffs were citizens of Texas then the case would be thrown out due to their lack of standing. I would claim that they had standing, but many cases seem to suggest that if a person is not financially harmed by another’s action then they have no standing.

[Antoninus]

Is the court going to allow that?

Yes, in two instances:

1. if the judge is afraid that the auctioneer's henchmen are going to show up at his house and torch it.

2. if the judge is in cahoots with the auctioneer.

Either of the above is possible.

[itsahoot]

So at this crooked auction, only crooks can win the bids and take the goods. Is the court going to allow that?

Well they have so far. </s>

[Jane Long]

If you have a ping list, for your ‘Audacious Election Lawsuits Vanities’, please add me ;-)

And, thank you for posting these.

[TianaHighrider]

Thank you for this.