Posted on 12/07/2020 1:12:45 PM PST by kellymcneill
If #SCOTUS grants cert in the PA election case, I have told the petitioners I will stand ready to present the oral argument.
Full statement below...
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
I don’t disagree with anything you said there. We’re not all that far apart after all. None of us are too old to learn, and that includes me.
Amy Howe
@AHoweBlogger
·
56m
#SCOTUS has *docketed* the case, which is different from agreeing to hear. Docketing means that the case has met the filing requirements; the case has to be docketed for the justices to consider it. It is 22O155, Texas v. Pennsylvania: https://supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html
SCOTUS has put Texas on the docket. They will hear it.
Yes!!! This is how it has to go!
👍
Gads! Every time any one of our guys steps up to fight there's a host of Freepers complaining time and again..D they just enjoy being miserable!
SCOTUS has put Texas on the docket. They will hear it.
PRAISE THE LORD!!!!
And, LA has joined the suit....I think FL and, hopefully, S Dakota....others will join.
Hallelujah!
Amen!
What does that even mean?
Paul Ryan and Ted cruz are 2 totally different animals. Ryan is swamp. Ted fought the swamp for YEARS. The only reason freepers get their panties in a wad is because he didn’t tow the party line in 2016. He’s a constitutionalist. Not a psychophant.
West VA is looking hopeful too
Good!!!
You again? I gave my opinion. I can’t read his mind and neither can you. Remember back in 2015-2016 how wrong you were about Trump? I do. Maybe you should try to keep an open mind and be a little less proud. It appears you learned nothing from 2015-2016.
Oh sheesh, well that explains allot....you’re likely still holding grudges....ok then..... we can end this now.
Ok- just learned that added to the docket just means it’s been received, does not mean they will hear the case.
My mistake, but we’ll see. There were no dissents in denying injunction in the Kelly case, so there must be strategic discussions at SCOTUS. Also- to be clear- the injunction only was denied- they didn’t toss the case. Just immediate relief.
I like Sekelow’s SC record, over Ted’s.
Just sayin’.
No grudges, just looking at the data. We’ve come to different conclusions about Ted Cruz. That’s fine. But I have pretty good judgement when it comes to people’s character - not perfect - but typically very good.
Your initial judgement about Trump was wrong. That’s fine. We all make mistakes. But you apparently have a hard time learning from them. You’re just as strident and emotional in defending Cruz as you were with Trump. I’m more than happy to talk with you - or not. It doesn’t really matter to me one way or another.
I thought we had a civil discussion on the Q thread the other day. I remembered our sparring during 2016, but I also remember that you were reasonable enough to admit you had been wrong about Trump so I had no grudge against you. I’m just noting some similarities between our discussion about Cruz and our discussions about Trump back in the day. If I thought you were a troll I never would have given you the time of day. But you still have a tendency to double down when you think you’re right, even when you aren’t.
Cruz fought the swamp for years? He only started serving in the Senate in Jan. 2013. Within 3 years he had already joined with the swamp in supporting the Trans Pacific Partnership, had determined that a man born in Canada to a Cuban citizen and an American citizen is a natural born citizen. He flip-flopped on opposing anchor babies - saying that the Constitution prevented any change to their status, until Trump disagreed and made it part of his platform. You should look a little closer at his record. Don’t be duped.
What part of ‘end this’ do you not understand?
You talking to me? I thought we were done.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.