Posted on 12/06/2020 8:49:17 AM PST by Phillyred
Ware County, Ga has broken the Dominion algorithm:
Using sequestered Dominion Equipment, Ware County ran a equal number of Trump votes and Biden votes through the Tabulator and the Tabulator reported a 26% lead for Biden.
Those conducting the test were so shocked that they ran the same ballots again. The same results appeared. ONE PIECE OF THE PUZZLE SOLVED. (It is worth noting that this was one County, and on one Tabulator alone.
https://twitter.com/robbhurstCPA/status/1335557576587665408?s=20
Oh look, it’s our resident Dominion representative, making his daily appearance to try to convince us NOTHING could have possibly gone wrong in the Georgia election!
While trying to claim that the Dominion machines were tested and validated before the election, he conveniently OMMITS the fact that the crooked Secretary of State Rattensbuger hired a firm that was literally linked to Dominion for years!
Georgia Secretary of State Hired Dominion-Linked Firm to Conduct Audit of Dominion Voting Systems
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3912336/posts
Only devoted shills for Dominion would claim this was on the up and up.
When I voted in Georgia, the voting machine asked me to verify my selections, then it asked me to print my ballot, then it asked me to check my paper ballot against my selections. I checked mine, what I selected was printed on the ballot. Georgia bought a paper ballot BMD which produced a "text summary" of the selections. This has been criticized because some voters do not verify their selections. Maybe that is true, but that would be on the voter and the process was simple and acknowledged by pressing the screen to end the voting process.
So there is a paper ballot printed with a QR code (a barcode) which encodes the selections of the voter, and also on the same piece of paper the text summary of the voter selections is shown.
Next is casting the ballot, which for me was done by the poll worker by placing the ballot into the scanner where it went through, was tabulated, and went into the "ballot box". I then got my sticker.
The machines read the QR code to determine voter selections and then tabulates and reports the counts for each item on the ballot. For President, the top text summary is who the voter selected for President. That isn't read by the scanner, just the QR code.
As part of implementing the new system in Georgia, it was required (I think by the Judge who also required that the old system without paper audit trail i.e. paper ballots be replaced with one that did have a paper audit trail) that at least one statewide race would be "checked" with what is called a "risk limiting audit" or "RLA". There are certain requirements for such like a statistical sampling formula to determine if the machine counting and tabulation portion of the new system was reporting accurately.
To meet the requirement, Raffensperger ordered the race to be the Presidential race, and ordered that instead of a statistical sample be counted that ALL 100% of the ballots be counted BY HAND. Since the RLA was to check the machine counters and tabulators, they would not be in any way used in the audit.
So all 152 counties in Georgia were required to take all paper ballots and count them by hand by discerning from the text summary (not the QR code) who was voted on for President. After counting all the ballots in this separate fashion, and for the exact reason that the Judge forced Georgia to buy a system with a paper trail, the paper ballots hand recounted did not determine a different outcome for the Presidential race.
Maybe there were a bunch of fraudulent ballots? Could be, but that would not be electronic fraud. BTW, I don't think running ballots 2 or 3 times really inflates the count. That would have easily been caught by the system, and since each paper ballot has a QR code, I would suspect the system is only going to tabulate any ballot just once. I certainly could construct such a system, and since the total number of electronically counted votes matched the number of paper ballots (for the most part, certainly with explainable reason), then we can conclude that the system ultimately prevents counting the same vote twice. In fact, the audit actually found uncounted ballots and un-tabulated results, thus the machine count was less than the hand counted ballots by 5,262. All of the above I write regarding the systems in Georgia. I can't say what went on in other states as I have not researched them like I have for Georgia, which is where I live.
Excuse my ignorance, but who is Rub Hurst? I see he’s a CPA, but is he involved with the audit somehow or have access to inside information?
Try stopping a glacier.
That is not what he said. He said a hand recount did not produce a different winner than the machine count, but the problem was the inclusion of invalid ballots in the count.
Not moving on from Dominion.
I heard someone use this analogy. To do something like that, it would have had to be an "Ocean's 11" kind of expert deception which would have included in a very many counties very red counters and elections supervisors in all 152 counties "fix up" the ballot pool.
You say they injected additional ballots, but really we already know that didn't happen. While the hand recount did actually count 5,262 new ballots STATEWIDE, these ultimately bolstered Trump's number and played no role in determining the winner of the Election.
Anyway, take a look at this document, there was no injection of "additional fake ballots" into the universe of paper ballots. Better come up with a better theory like the pull and replace theory, something like that, where in all 152 counties someone pulls the correct number and kind of ballots and replaces them with the new prepared ones. I think even this would have been caught by the third machine count. After all, there are QR codes on these paper ballots, they aren't just naked. You would have to do a QR Code for QR Code replacement which is just not plausible. At some point, at least for me, you realize that for Georgia and in the Presidential race, there was no part by Dominion in determining the outcome.
"I refuse to answer on the grounds that my answer might tend to incriminate me."
Senate Republican: "Thank you sir. You are excused."
MLNJ
I’m glad to post to people willing to read. You aren’t on my list but I’m glad to see you around anyway.
You clearly still haven’t watched the Georgia hearing on these matters. Suspicious ballots were everywhere, especially in Fulton county.
One of the State Employees testified she was replaced by Dominion employees, who had a fraction of her experience, but these Dominion employees actually ran the election against state law.
Another said that “test ballots” were printed off by the tens of thousands, that she personally knew of, but were never invalidated and were instead kept in boxes near the supposedly official ballots.
She said when she took a couple of those “test” ballots, and inserted them into your vaunted Dominion machine, *BINGO* it counted the test ballot as an official election ballot!
So don’t sit here an try to tell us that hand counts of what have been set aside as the supposedly true ballots, are actually true ballots!
You have no way of knowing. The only thing you seem to know, is that defending Dominion is your sworn mission.
I decided; but no one seems to care.
ML/NJ
WOW, THAT IS A REALLY PECULIAR ANALOGY YOU JUST CITED.
Why?
Because it is the EXACT SAME analogy that the "Georgia Voting Systems Manager" Gabriel Sterling made a couple of days ago!
Are you using his talking points?
Or, are you Gabriel Sterling, himself?
Surely you're not now going to try to claim this was just some sort of strange coincidence, are you?
” ... Dominion employees actually ran the election against state law. ....”
Even if the Dominion personnel were as pure as the driven snow the fact they were directly involved in direct violation of Georgia law should immediately invalidate all ballots they handled. Voters thus disenfranchised should sue Dominion & the county election officials who made the decision (Also these officials should be held criminally liable !)
Well, I’m not Gabriel and couldn’t pick him out of a crowd of two, but it is a pretty good analogy. What do you expect when people argue that ballot stacks were tampered with before the hand recount in 152 counties to make the reported numbers equal the votes cast by China and Iran pulling the voter levers by machine? I mean, come on already. I’m mad, but I’m not that far gone yet.
Yes, I’ve read that stated in the manual - but they could say that’s an error blah blah and yes, if the ‘skew’ is data read in and reset to 1=1 then the code would say something like ‘voteTally += vote * skewfactor;’ NOT what it honestly SHOULD say ‘voteTally++;’. Just as an example. As the army intel guy said - it SHOULD be straight addition, not formulaic ‘algorithm’.
Well, good chances. It’s Windows 10 and a distributed system - so yes could be Java, C++, C, or Python but my educated guess is that it’s C#/.NET WPF UI with distributed APIs on the server or WCF.
Not relevant to machine count fraud.
One of the State Employees testified she was replaced by Dominion employees, who had a fraction of her experience, but these Dominion employees actually ran the election against state law.
Not relevant in light of the 100% hand recount of the paper ballots.
Another said that “test ballots” were printed off by the tens of thousands, that she personally knew of, but were never invalidated and were instead kept in boxes near the supposedly official ballots.
She said when she took a couple of those “test” ballots, and inserted them into your vaunted Dominion machine, *BINGO* it counted the test ballot as an official election ballot!
Not relevant since the ballots cast match the voters who voted match the number of ballots the machines counted.
So don’t sit here an try to tell us that hand counts of what have been set aside as the supposedly true ballots, are actually true ballots!
You have no way of knowing. The only thing you seem to know, is that defending Dominion is your sworn mission.
I'm open to suggestions on how they got the numbers to match up considering all these added ballots to the system.
Otherwise, as you know from my posting, I'm far from the point where I called bull crap to these assertions of a Dominion conspiracy in Georgia at least as regards the Presidential race. But then again, I was at least willing to be shown.
I've snagged the picture of the transcript in case it gets wiped now.
I'd say you're busted pal. The chances of you coming up with the exact same analogy as Gabriel Sterling did yesterday are pretty close to infinite.
I expected you to at least say you saw him say it. But sitting here trying to claim you wouldn't even recognize him at all, despite your supposed expert knowledge of Dominion machines and processes is also incredibly unlikely.
There's really no other explanation for why you would even be here, arguing with us endlessly about the validity of these machines.
But we're on to you, obviously. So you will continue to fail.
Some statistical sleuths have already looked into this. They are just being ignored.
Sub four minute video from testimony from Georgia. (Bottom line: Biden got five percent more votes than model predicted by county, NATIONWIDE, in counties that used Dominion machines.)
ML/NJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.