Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Some bad language at the site. I want one!

Bill Murray coulda used these in Caddyshack.

1 posted on 12/05/2020 12:59:31 PM PST by dynachrome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: dynachrome

I want either one of them under the Christmas Tree this year.


2 posted on 12/05/2020 1:02:07 PM PST by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

4 posted on 12/05/2020 1:11:31 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

On 8 and 9 Sept 2001 I took my reserve unit to the ranges, since it was the end of the fiscal year we were able to get lots of ammo. We got 600 rounds of 40mm Target Practice. So I went to firing line with 30 rounds and rapid fired the M203.

After 24 years of service I discovered the M203 is a great final protective fires weapon, it took me less than 2 minutes to fire the 30 rounds.


5 posted on 12/05/2020 1:16:35 PM PST by where's_the_Outrage? (Drain the Swamp. Build the Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Dang, we were issued M203’s in the Air Force back in the late 70’s. Kind of shocked they’re still around. Then again, so are M16’s so there’s that.


7 posted on 12/05/2020 1:26:48 PM PST by fidelis (Zonie and USAF Cold Warrior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

I loved my M203. While in the Army, I was a M577 Track Driver and was issued the M203. Cool thing is that it doesn’t have to accurate, just close.


8 posted on 12/05/2020 1:30:19 PM PST by Psycho_Runner (Have a good day, unless you have other plans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

I have extended experience with the M-79 and the M-203, including in combat. The M-79 was simple and lightweight, but dangerous due to the inadequate safety. Most experienced grenadiers kept the action broken and usually did not carry a round in the chamber. The other drawback was that the secondary weapon with the .45. The M-203 was safer and the M-16 was the secondary weapon. It was a little clumsy and took longer to load. Grenadiers needed longer to become accurate with the M-203.

I have never fired the M-320, but I have dry fired it and have had extensive discussions with current gredadiers. I like it. I think that in most situations, I would sling my M-4 across my chest and use the M-320 as the primary weapon in a stand alone mode.


9 posted on 12/05/2020 1:37:04 PM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome
Not a huge fan of the 40mm: tiny little golf-ball shaped warhead enclosed within its aerodynamic ogive. Throws itty-bitty fragments, so it's maybe a wounder instead of a killer. It also has a high rainbow ballistic arc and requires the firer to expose head and shoulders above cover to aim and fire it - and a loong wait to see where it hit.

If somebody's shooting at you, it seems like forever for the round to finally get there.

Proposed using a modern, US-made version of the Japanese Type 89 Grenade Projector ("Knee Mortar") which weighs 10 pounds, is fired from the prone, and is quite accurate out to 670 meters meters. It fires a one pound HE/steel warhead and reputedly accounted for a high proportion of our casualties during the Pacific War.

Imagine how great it would have been for engaging Hajis in Iraq and Afghanistan!

Proposed the idea years ago to the Marine Corps Lab and Dahlgren an I had two Type 89s for firing but while we were building US-safe projectiles, my project was shut down.

By the way, FN showed us a 40mm grenade launcher that fired the higher horsepower Mk19 rounds - beat the living crap out of those few of us who would try the thing out!

11 posted on 12/05/2020 1:52:48 PM PST by Chainmail (Remember that half the people you meet are below average intelligence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

ahhhhhh anyone missing the lonely sound of the thumper probing the perimeter in the middle of the night? lolol


12 posted on 12/05/2020 1:56:49 PM PST by redcatcherb412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Give me 2, the old one and the new one, Jeeze, I’m an old softie..


15 posted on 12/05/2020 2:10:53 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Love that site!!! Bookmarked. Finally, fellow travellers 😁


23 posted on 12/05/2020 4:32:23 PM PST by Basket_of_Deplorables (This is all a Soros funded communist insurrection! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

The author’s blog is GOLD!


24 posted on 12/05/2020 5:05:55 PM PST by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nailbiter

Bang


33 posted on 12/05/2020 9:57:36 PM PST by IncPen ("Inside of every progressive is a Totalitarian screaming to get out" ~ David Horowi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson