Posted on 12/02/2020 9:23:34 AM PST by PJ-Comix
Okay, I understand that there is a good case to be made before the U.S. Supreme Court that the states of Pennsylvania and Georgia changed their election laws or rules without authorization from their state legislatures. However, what of the other states in question? Have other states changed their election laws or rules without authorization from their state legislatures?
I think there were 7states that did this among them are PA, GA, MI, WISC, ARZ, NM and NV. This was from memory so take it for what it’s worth.
Well they all had obvious election fraud but specifically which ones had election/law changes that were NOT approved by their state legislatures?
There was a complete ignoring of MI law in Detroit, Pontiac, and Flint. Felonies were committed. People NEED to go to jail.
I do believe those are the seven that made unauthorized changes and all had election fiascos. Quite a coincidence isn’t it.
I also see the same thing for Nevada in which it violated federal and state election for maintaining voter lists.
NJ would have been. Murphy by EO had mail in ballots sent to all registered voters. Team Trump sued because he did not have that power. The NJ legislature (controlled by D’s) past the necessary legislation to permit mail in ballots to all registered voters.
“””Were There Any Election Law/Rule Changes NOT Authorized by State Legislatures Other than PA & GA?”””
Until the Lawsuits were filed in PA, GA, WI, I would say most people were not aware of the number and ways Election Laws were not being followed by Election Officials those states as dictated by ‘shall’ language in State Statutes and Constitutions.
So if the other USA States were subjected to the same scrutiny as the lawsuits did, I am afraid we would see widespread abuse by Election Officials who blatantly disregarded the ‘shall’ language in their election laws and statutes.
Our USA elction system is a mess.
North Carolina can count votes received 9 days after Election Day, Supreme Court says
https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/28/politics/north-carolina-supreme-court-nine-days/index.html
There is also existing law that was ignored. In the disputed states and more
In North Carolina our Governor and Attorney General agreed to an out of court deal with Marc Elias to ignore all absentee ballot rules for the 2020 election. The Legislature filed a lawsuit and the state supreme court ruled that because of covid the Governor could pretty much do whatever he wanted!
In Wisconsin, I believe that the election administrators provided guidance to local clerks that conflicted with the Wisconsin statutes governing the conduct of elections. Of course, all of the bad advice benefited Biden.
I am unaware of the Wisconsin legislature changing its laws.
If the courts hold the laws on the books must be followed, Trump takes the state.
Read the US Constitution, especially about elections. It advances a political mechanism as opposed to a criminal one. The state Legislatures communicate the election choice of electors through them, so that if the election is UNLAWFUL they can choose an alternate set of electors themselves, or reward the candidates who didn’t cheat with the choice of their electors. Or they can come up with their own electors. If no electors are presented, then the Electoral College shrinks by that state’s number of EV (Electoral Votes). If states want to be represented in Presidential elections, they better elect Secretaries of State who can produce LAWFUL elections. hint- “LAWFUL” and “UNLAWFUL” are the correct political terms for the special relationship between states legislatures and the US Constitution in federal elections.
In PA, the legislature did change the laws to facilitate mail in voting. Problem is, it required a constitutional amendment, to be voted on by the people, not just a law enacted.
Yes, because states' election laws are tied to the US Constitution, they will vary. In PA, their election laws state that changes are presented to a public vote, which wasn't done. So the changes by the Executive and Judicial branches of government don't mean squat. Well, they do make the election UNLAWFUL from the get-go.
wisconsin
I’d be shocked if Nevada’s signature recognition program (they changed the standard from a 90% match to 80% to 40% to 30% - then unofficially accepted any ballot at all) was approved by the state legislature.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.