Posted on 12/01/2020 4:18:39 PM PST by MHGinTN
I wonder, if the election outcome in any state or several combined reaches the Supreme Court, what remedy would best suit that Court?
The Court issues a rejection or a remedy. If the Court chooses to seek a remedy, the following is a suggestion of what remedy would disenfranchise the least voters who are on record as legitimate, not in question via mail-in ballots.
Late in the evening of 11/3 early morning of 11/4 a command from 'someone' came to the powers overseeing the counting in Milwaukee, Detroit, Philly and Pittsburgh, Atlanta, and Maricopa County, Arizona and a few other cities. That command was to stop counting and send away the counting observers watching the counting. That was coordinated, not coincidence.
When lawfully appointed observers / monitors were no longer present to lawfully observe counting, the several cities restarted counting massive numbers of 'mail-in' ballots.
There are several legitimate issues with these massive ballot dumps, beyond the forced exclusion of lawful monitoring. ALL of the ballots counted during the illicit counting are suspect since illicit means were used to hide the counting of these suspect ballots.
As a reasonable remedy, the Supreme Court could point to that moment of coordinated stoppage until lawful observers were prevented from watching subsequent counting, as the point beyond which no ballots can be included in the lawfully received votes at the various precincts. Disqualifying all ballots counted after that stoppage and ejection of any legitimate observers is the remedy the Court can use to legitimize the election results.
The status of ALL candidates for down ballot positions and the top of the ticket presidential position would be remedied with the least amount of actual voters disenfranchised. Such a remedy might make a run off in Georgia unnecessary and might even bring a good man from Michigan into the United States Senate.
I wonder where all the election positions stood when the stop counting command was issued?
Hopefully their instinct for survival and self-preservation will help. Sustained prayer will also certainly do no harm.
“President Biden and Vice President Trump”
OMG! Now THAT would be entertaining! Trump would be moppin’ the FLOOR with him every day, LOL!
I’m confused .... since when ?? do the words “legal” and “valid” mean legal and valid????
Establishment politicians of both parties hate Trump with a passion. That tells us a lot.
The “remedy” would be to nullify the involved states’ presidential elections. Then it would be the responsibility of each state’s legislature to independently decide to either select their state’s electors themselves or schedule a RAPID, CLEAN statewide election to do so.
The constitutional remedy is right in plain sight. When electoral vote totals are disputed as in this case. The House of Representatives elects the President. ONE VOTE FOR EACH STATE. A majority of the states have majority Republican delegations. Trump wins unless more than one Republican delegation betrays him and votes for Biden. God help the traitorous Republican delegation(s) who do so.
Any disenfranchisement is laid at the feet of the corrupt officials who aided and abetted fraudulent voting.
Going forward, the Democrat criminals will realize stealing votes puts all of their voting citizens outside of the presidential election process when the 12th Amendment comes into play at the end.
I thought some states had to receive completed ballots by 8pm election night 3 Nov.
end of election day is midnight 3 Nov. of the disputed states, only Pennsylvania is listed in the following:
3 Nov: BayNews9: Here Are The States That Will Accept Ballots After Election Day
By Austin Landis
Pennsylvania - Lean Democrat
Last week, the Supreme Court allowed Pennsylvania to count all mail-in ballots received by Nov. 6. The state’s Republican party challenged the ruling, which the court declined to take up. On Monday, President Trump promised a legal battle over the decision.
https://www.baynews9.com/fl/tampa/politics/2020/11/03/the-states-accepting-ballots-after-election-day-
why aren’t the dumps in the early hours of 4 Nov illegal?
am I missing something?
Nothing would be investigated once Biden was sworn in.
If the democraps steal this I am out.
No, I will not explain what that means.
Don’t believe any of US are missing something or anything ... only fact I can lay my finger on is massive fraud and law violations .... will anything come of the law and restoration of rules .... imho 60/40
That remedy would disenfranchise too many licit voters, especially those who voted in person on 11/3.
the Speaker of the House would act as President during situations in which neither a President nor Vice President has qualified, and would continue to do so until the situation is resolved or the term of office expires
“That remedy would disenfranchise too many licit voters, especially those who voted in person on 11/3.”
*****************************************
That’s true. But it does comply with the Constitution.
I’m Out,
It will be like the
Sinking of the Titanic.
I won’t explain it either.
The Supreme Court of MICHIGAN allowed. And Justice Alito instructed them to keep those ballots separate in case the COURT had to adjudicate them. That instruction from SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ALITO was ignored and the questionable ballots were included / hidden among the legitimate ballots. The only remedy for that violation is to toss ALL ballots counted AFTER the observers were sent away in the command to stop counting, which was a ruse to eliminate observers of the massive ballot dumps which began almost immediately in the suspect cities.
That’s close to my take. I would suggest midnight on election day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.