Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CAN POLICE REFUSE ORDERS FROM MAYORS?

Posted on 12/01/2020 9:08:22 AM PST by cradle of freedom

We have seen police appear to "stand down" during rioting, looting and violence. Many think that they are given orders to allow rioters to have their way.

Do police have the right to reject orders from mayors to stand down? If you are a police officer I would like to hear what you have to say.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: kenosha; police; riots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 12/01/2020 9:08:22 AM PST by cradle of freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

Does it matter?


2 posted on 12/01/2020 9:09:10 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Now?


3 posted on 12/01/2020 9:09:19 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

Biden won so as You SEE no more Riots:-)


4 posted on 12/01/2020 9:10:34 AM PST by Harpotoo (Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

Of course they can...but at what cost?


5 posted on 12/01/2020 9:11:33 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (BLM Stands For "Bidens Loot Millions"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City_Police_riot

The New York City Police Riot of 1857, known at the time as the Great Police Riot, was a conflict which occurred in front of New York City Hall between the recently dissolved New York Municipal Police and the newly formed Metropolitan Police on June 16, 1857. Arising over New York City Mayor Fernando Wood’s appointment of Charles Devlin over Daniel Conover for the position of city street commissioner, amid rumors that Devlin purchased the office for $50,000 from Wood, Municipal police battled Metropolitan officers attempting to arrest Mayor Wood.


6 posted on 12/01/2020 9:13:03 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets ("Women's intuition" gave us the Salem witch trials and Kavanaugh hearings. Change my mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom
They can't infringe on the rights of citizens, so they shouldn't just blindly follow orders from criminal mayors. But some will because they'll fear losing their cushy pensions.
7 posted on 12/01/2020 9:13:35 AM PST by Major Matt Mason (Q is the larpiest larp that ever larped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

Two words for everyone: Oath Keepers.

All public employees take an oath to the constitution. Some keep it.


8 posted on 12/01/2020 9:15:26 AM PST by old-ager (anti-new-ager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

Sure, but they risk being fired.


9 posted on 12/01/2020 9:15:40 AM PST by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

They can also be fired too, but it also depends on what and why the refuse orders.


10 posted on 12/01/2020 9:16:00 AM PST by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Major Matt Mason

Therein lies the problem. Their money is more important than our freedoms.


11 posted on 12/01/2020 9:17:10 AM PST by NTHockey (My rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

Yes, and then risk being fired.


12 posted on 12/01/2020 9:17:21 AM PST by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

I wasn’t a police officer, but was a peace officer for New York State. In our rules and regulations, there was a specific clause that dealt with unlawful orders. If we believed that the order we had been given was unlawful, and that it could lead to the death or injury of ourselves and others, then we had the right to disobey that order. Of course we would have had to defend ourselves later, but the option was available, and I’d have to believe that the same clause is covered in all police department rules and regulations manuals.


13 posted on 12/01/2020 9:17:59 AM PST by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

I don’t know, who has the greater firepower?


14 posted on 12/01/2020 9:18:38 AM PST by Aevery_Freeman (I voted...but it doesn't matter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom
"If you are a police officer I would like to hear what you have to say."

Good Luck with that - Not a police officer.

15 posted on 12/01/2020 9:18:41 AM PST by DannyTN (<P><a href="https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3902132/posts">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bayard

Police are supposed to arrest people when they are burning, looting and endangering public safety.


16 posted on 12/01/2020 9:19:07 AM PST by cradle of freedom (ET TU FOX NEWS. TRUMP TV THE ANTIDOTE TO FOX NEWS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

Yes all can, on constitutional grounds.

And also on fiscal/administrative grounds if they are elected directly by the People..........Such as a mayoral order NOT to engage looters and rioters.


17 posted on 12/01/2020 9:19:44 AM PST by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism:http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

Police Officers take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. And to enforce the laws of our state.

We are legally required to obey all ‘lawful’ orders.

An order not to take action when observing a crime in progress is not lawful. It can and often is disregarded by the rank-and-file. However, cops are subject to retaliation and a refusal to be provided immunity against ruinous lawsuits filed by perps against whom we take enforcement action. This is the dilemna faced by cops. It is why I ultimately decided to retire.


18 posted on 12/01/2020 9:19:49 AM PST by Freedomlibertyjustice (Remember when Popes were actually Catholic? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

They can easily obstruct, impede, refuse and delay orders to go DO something. But if they are ordered not to intervene in a riot, and to make arrests, and they do, the mayor will pick up the phone to the governor or the FBI, and they will be facing arrests and ruin.
The more interesting question is why do you think police will go out and enforce laws that the entire political structure above has ordered not be enforced? That’s the action of a kamikaze.

It makes as much sense to ask why the police department doesn’t just walk in and arrest the mayor for issuing that order. And then turn it over to the DA who says he will not prosecute.


19 posted on 12/01/2020 9:20:08 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. .... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

I am a retired Fire Officer; we used the same type of incident command structure and protocol as the police. I suppose you are making the assumption that there is some type of Hippocratic Oath for police, but there is not. Police and Fire follow orders from above. If we were responding to someone with a papercut and we came across a serious motor vehicle accident our protocol was basically to report the accident but continue to the call we were assigned to. Of course in reality we would report that we had come across a life threatening situation and communications needed to reassign our original call and send us whatever additional resources that we requested.


20 posted on 12/01/2020 9:20:29 AM PST by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson