Posted on 11/28/2020 11:19:57 AM PST by ransomnote
So Tag is it ?
Wouldn’t it be sweet to see a side by side video of the Eisenhower SCIF against the diddling with the thumb drive and laptop to see a mysterious spike appear????? Salivating...
Well, ask somebody else, please.
I just wanted to pick a post from someone I thought was still awake...
Speaking of which, past my bedtime, good night!
:-)
***************************************************************************************
Well, I’m just now getting back to the thread. So I hope someone else noticed your post. So No, I don’t think I’ll be asking someone else. You are still free to ask whomever you want though.
You are welcome...it’s from a TV special called: Toonces, The Cat Who Could Drive A Car.
Check it out on U-tube, unfortunately not available on DVD, only vhs
So far so good. We're at dang near a million impressions now.
If you like to gamble, I tell you I’m you’re man,
You win some, lose some it’s all the same to me,
The pleasure is to play, it makes no difference what you say,
I don’t share your greed, the only card I need is,
The Ace Of Spades.
The only way is the military. Fully controlled.
I agree that a large percentage of the DOJ/FBI is compromised or otherwise untrustworthy. That is why it is incumbent on honest leaders to take charge of something like this. Barr, were he doing his job, would appoint a team of prosecutors who were trustworthy, and send them out to the problem cities, each with their own team of trusted FBI agents not reporting to Wray. He should have directed the US attorney in each of those cities to impanel grand juries and start hauling people in. He should have impounded the voting machines. The amount of fraud and corruption that could have been uncovered is astronomical. In fact, Biden probably would have given up by now.
I agree that a large percentage of the DOJ/FBI is compromised or otherwise untrustworthy. That is why it is incumbent on honest leaders to take charge of something like this. Barr, were he doing his job, would appoint a team of prosecutors who were trustworthy, and send them out to the problem cities, each with their own team of trusted FBI agents not reporting to Wray. He should have directed the US attorney in each of those cities to impanel grand juries and start hauling people in. He should have impounded the voting machines. The amount of fraud and corruption that could have been uncovered is astronomical. In fact, Biden probably would have given up by now.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Deep State can’t give up. China will force/kill it’s non-compliant actors, as will Iran, etc.
“Barr, were he doing his job, would appoint a team of prosecutors who were trustworthy, and send them out to the problem cities, each with their own team of trusted FBI agents not reporting to Wray. “
Investigators report findings in systems that should be secure but may not be. Have to be officially enterred into gov database etc. Hard to say who is a mole/sleeper that hasn’t been activated. We don’t know yet if Barr has taken action he’s not reporting.
There are still Federal Attorney’s who are corrupt. The actions you suggest would be distorted as Trump’s admin launching an all out assault on elections and fabricating reports to overturn the election results.
The amount of fraud is indeed so astronomical that it will be hard for some in the public to accept. It would be made harder if the MSM was shrieking for the UN and claiming Trump has rejected valid election results per all “objective” news agencies and former officials (Comey, Brennan) etc. Just my 2.
Read between the lines.
Barr is US AG
No evidence of violations of federal election law.
:: F’k ‘em and feed ‘em beans. ::
In that order...it’s for the children.
“Is it time to declare martial law, and warm up the helicopters?”
Of course, that’s our President’s decision. But as I said earlier, it’s a comforting thought to know if he did declare martial law, Trump is one of the few men we could trust to do it right.
BUt election fraud is a fedearl crime, read on DoJ site. Lemme search.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/20511
52 U.S. Code § 20511.Criminal penalties
A person, including an election official, who in any election for Federal office—
(1)knowingly and willfully intimidates, threatens, or coerces, or attempts to intimidate, threaten, or coerce, any person for—
(A)registering to vote, or voting, or attempting to register or vote;
(B)urging or aiding any person to register to vote, to vote, or to attempt to register or vote; or
(C)exercising any right under this chapter; or
(2)knowingly and willfully deprives, defrauds, or attempts to deprive or defraud the residents of a State of a fair and impartially conducted election process, by—
(A)the procurement or submission of voter registration applications that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held; or
(B)the procurement, casting, or tabulation of ballots that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held,
shall be fined in accordance with title 18 (which fines shall be paid into the general fund of the Treasury, miscellaneous receipts (pursuant to section 3302 of title 31), notwithstanding any other law), or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
(Pub. L. 103–31, § 12, May 20, 1993, 107 Stat. 88.)
And the DoJ:
https://www.justice.gov/usao-nh/pr/federal-election-fraud-fact-sheet
Federal Election Fraud Fact Sheet
Most issues concerning the administration and conduct of elections are governed and regulated by state law and are best addressed by state and local election officials. Federal law enforcement and prosecutorial authorities have jurisdiction to investigate and, when appropriate, prosecute election fraud in the following circumstances:
I. Federal Criminal Jurisdiction
Federal criminal jurisdiction over the activities described below can generally be obtained when those activities take place:
In elections where a federal candidate’s name is on the ballot.
In any election (federal or nonfederal), when the fraud involves the necessary participation of an election official acting “under color of law.”
In connection with voter registration. The fact that voter registration is “unitary” in all 50 States (a citizen registers once to become eligible to vote for both federal and nonfederal candidates) confers federal jurisdiction regardless of the type of election.
In connection with the misuse, or unauthorized trespass, involving a computer system used in connection with an election, to the extent that the misuse or trespass is conducted “under color of law.”
II. Conduct Actionable as Federal Election Fraud, Intimidation, or Suppression
The following activities provide a basis for federal prosecution under the statutes referenced in each category:
Paying voters to register to vote, or to vote in elections where a federal candidate’s name is on the ballot (52 U.S.C. § 10307, 18 U.S.C. § 597), or through the use of the mails in those States where vote buying is a “bribery” offense (18 U.S.C. § 1952), or in federal elections in those States where purchased votes or registrations are voidable under state law (52 U.S.C. § 20511).
Multiple voting in a federal election, voting for individuals in a federal election who do not personally participate in the voting act attributed to them, or impersonating voters (52 U.S.C. §§ 10307, 20511).
Intimidating voters through physical duress in any election (18 U.S.C. § 245(b)(1)(A)); or through physical or economic intimidation in connection with registration to vote or voting in a federal election (52 U.S.C. § 20511, 18 U.S.C. § 594).If the victim is a federal employee, intimidation in connection with all elections is prohibited (18 U.S.C. § 610).
Malfeasance by election officials, acting “under color of law,” such as diluting valid ballots with invalid ones (so-called “ballot box stuffing”), rendering false vote tabulations, or preventing valid voter registrations or votes from being given effect in any election (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242), as well as in elections where federal candidates are on the ballot (52 U.S.C. §§ 10307, 20511).
Qualifying fictitious individuals to vote in federal elections by placing fictitious names on voter registration rolls (52 U.S.C. §§ 10307, 20511); or through “color of law” in any election (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242).
Preventing or impeding qualified voters from participating in an election where a federal candidate’s name is on the ballot through such tactics as disseminating false information as to the date, timing, or location of federal voting activity (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242).
Registering to vote, or voting in a federal election, by persons who are not entitled to vote under applicable state law, most notably persons who have committed serious crimes, and persons who are not United States citizens (18 U.S.C. §§ 1015(f), 611, and 52 U.S.C. § 20511).
Falsely claiming United States citizenship in connection with registering to vote or voting in any election (18 U.S.C. §§ 911, 1015(f)).
Voting in a federal election by anyone who is not a United States citizen in those States where citizenship is a requisite for the franchise (currently all 50 States) (18 U.S.C. § 611).
Providing false information concerning a voter’s name, address, or period of residence in order to register to vote, or to vote in a federal election (52 U.S.C. §§ 10307, 20511).
Causing the submission of voter registrations in any election, or of ballots in federal elections, that are materially defective under applicable state law (52 U.S.C. § 20511).
Ordering, keeping, or having under one’s control any troops or armed men at any polling place in a general or special election, if one is a civil or military officer or employee of the United States government (18 U.S.C. § 592).
To report federal election fraud, intimidation, or suppression contact the United States Attorney’s Office Election Day Hotline at (603) 230-2503. Inquiries and complaints may also be submitted through the United States Attorney’s website at www.usdoj.gov/usao/nh by clicking on the “email us” link.
I was simply bookmarking your post so I could come back later to the link you posted & watch the video.
I wonder if he's a top or a bottom.
BDA CIA Fren Update Hopium
In a nutshell:
1. Presidential Address announcing the depth of the coup efforts. Not sure if he will go into the fact that american elections have been rigged for at least 20 years.
2. Release of the JFK files and the appearance by someone you all love and care about.
3. Pardoning of Julian Assange
4. Partial martial law and the utilization of military courts to weed out the seditious players. A number of politicians, media players, and others will be arrested.
I think WildHighlander57 grabbed it, thanks!
I’m looking at military air traffic. I’ve never seen so many planes in the air at one time over the US. Typically it’s between 20 to 50 planes total. today it’s hundreds though most are type Tex2 (trainers and smaller) and T38 (trainer fighters) so it could be nothing
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.