Scytl source code

Github ^ | 11/26/20 | TigerLikesRoosterNew

[TigerLikesRoosterNew]

Exibit 8 of Sydney's lawsuit in Georgia mentions a Github account belonging to Scytl(pp 13~ 15). It has about a dozen directories. The witness points out Jseats directory. In his words,

"In the GitHub account for Scytl, Scytl Jseats has some of the programming necessary to support a much broader set of election types, including a decorator process where the data is smoothed..."

its URL: https://github.com/scytl

Anybody interested in it may need to download it before it disappears. The programs listed there were created between 2014 and 2016.

[ptsal]

;
linked source of flow chart

https://github.com/Scytl/jseats

[PIF]

here’s how I interpret this code:
We all assume when 7 people vote, there are seven votes, and the machine counts 3 votes for one guy and 4 votes for the other for example.

However, what actually happens (because it seems all electronic voting is, in one way or another designed to cheat) is that the machine does the above process, then in one process applies various filters, sorting percentages, smoothing, spiting out 1 vote for one guy and 3 votes for the other guy.

What happened to the other 3 votes? They got mangled in the processes either deliberately or accidentally and were forever lost.

In another, the machine does the first counting process, then after applying other filters and so forth, spits out 6 votes for one guy and 1 vote for the other. All 7 votes are accounted for.

In another, the machine does the first counting process, then after applying other filters and so forth, spits out 20 votes for one guy and 3 for the other. We now have more votes than went into the machine, so mangers must create more voters by enlisting the dead, the ineligible, or just making the voter name, address etc up out of thin air.

And because this is the outcome desired, the manager or poll worker feeds the same batch through the machine 4 times, thus giving the final tally of 120 for one guy and 15 for the other, creating an insurmountable lead for the desired candidate.

This is why electronic voting cannot be trusted and must never be used again, except under the HarrisBiden regime where it will be mandatory.

[1Remnant]

Thank you

[j_guru]

cloned for safe keeping.

[GailA]

Me too, just enough to do a photo or a color. Hubby taught the stuff way back when there was Commodore 64’s, Taught CISCO to the would be teachers. Fixed electrical in Navy nearly 20 yrs, 20 yrs Jr College, retired as Chair of dept. Wife had no interest in learning Nerd stuff.

[SueRae]

That looks pretty much what happened! Good to see you again.

[Fresh Wind]

LOL!

[wildcard_redneck]

"Not a newbie. I am a reincarnated one. I have been here since 1999."

I am on my 2nd handle myself.

[Slyfox]

LOL

[MV=PY]

Great! Thanks for posting.