Posted on 11/21/2020 6:15:30 PM PST by Golden Eagle
Should be coming right up, they just said they are working on her connection now.
https://www.newsmaxtv.com/
Bump
And he won “another fabulous house”. He’s a whore. Rush is right; Bernie pretty much is OK with losing. All the time.
How the hay did Mark Halperin get on Newsmax? He seems so pissed off to be there. He wants to make his skeptical “no evidence” statements and he knows he can’t. It’s like a popular actor being relegated to playing birthday parties. He isn’t happy. It is worth it to see him sitting there grumpy!!
We have to have patience. I am sure they are working around the clock.
Dershowitz is right.. she has to put up. States are certifying their results.. if this goes too far it won’t matter what she has... you can’t overturn an electoral college vote.. no precedence for it.
“How the hay did Mark Halperin get on Newsmax? ... He isn’t happy.”
Well, when you get fired from a job with the MSM for sexual harassment, you have to lower your expectations if you want to continue to work.
He knew about it and played it nicely. He got a lovely beach home, plus 4 more years of kicking back and complaining rather than having to work, and another kick at the cat with more comrades working with him than last time. I think Bernie just likes to do a lot of rebel rousing and cashing in.
the dominion manual and the guy in venezuela are what sidney keeps pointing to as some smoking gun. oh, and Carol Malone’s letter in 2003 🙄
Quite the little pack of rats there
She said twice that there is new evidence that a flat 35,000 votes were added to several Democratic candidates. Guess you were too busy typing your complaints to notice.
Dershowitz was polite but said as it stands now, he doesn’t see this being reversed for Trump.
He quite accurately said you will have to prove enough votes have to change in each of these states, scattered reports are not going to do it.
I think Sydney is fanning the flames of a very small fire. She also talks about the evidence already being on line.
As it stands now, this ain’t happening.
and that statistical analysis are the online sleuths we've seen.
Why should she give her evidence on a TV interview?
She should save it for litigation.
She will present her evidence to a court of law, not a talk show.
Sorry to burst your bubble.
Just watched the Powell interview. If she’s right and has the goods she’s promised, this is going to have seismic repercussions. This is much bigger than the re-election of the president. And if true, there should be prison terms and maybe even a few hangings. And I wouldn’t rule out a civil war.
I heard her and you have to understand in politics all kinds of rumors go around.
She said 35,000 votes were added to every Democrat in the country. I call total bs.
She also said “thousands” of people would have to have been involved country wide. Evidence? I think she’s crazy and irresponsible saying that.
And “she’s heard” the republican governor of Georgia was paid off. That’s irresponsible as well.
I know lawyers, I doubt very much Sydney believes half of what she’s throwing out there. She’s saying a lot of it very carefully because she’s “heard” things, not that she has proof.
Iheard that bombshell 🙄
At this point....I feel like a dope...who’s been roped.
Like that idiot “lawyer” who was searching for Obama’s birth certificate.
Sorry to be so cynical.
Flame away, peeps.
I will eat my words if something happens. And rejoice.
Yeah you didn’t burst my bubble. If she has the evidence we’ll see it. She doesn’t have it. That’s rather obvious.
Well, Bernie got bought off with another house, so ....
Yeah, he’s really busy pissing on everything Sidney Powell said.
Basically called her a liar, “NO EVIDENCE,” like the MSM has been doing.
Hey dude, it’s not a courtroom.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.