Posted on 11/19/2020 6:34:21 PM PST by MNDude
Its 4 and a half minutes long. He sure implies she's not honest.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Tucker Carlson has a point. “Evidence” isn’t Lin Wood or Sydney Powell saying they saw the real evidence. Lin Wood and Sydney Powell aren’t “witnesses.” I think Tucker wanted Sydney to at least show him the affidavits but I believe Sydney is doing the wise thing and only presenting the evidence in court.
Why?
I trust Sidney.
I trust nobody on Fox.
.
He saying, PROVE IT, and you can come on.
It’s his staff setting her up.
This is common when you want make someone look bad without letting them speak.
Watch it again, Prove it to my producer.
Tucker was at the Country Club, he left this to his staff.
Notice, the default position. Trump had to prove he wasn’t a Russian agent, per Brett Baier he should embrace Mueller, if he’s innocent.
I posted on Monday that Tucker Carlson was going to be pushing stories that Election Fraud has been debunked.
There it is.
‘
"This is stunning, heartbreaking, infuriating, and the most unpatriotic acts that I can even imagine for people in this country to have participated in, in any way, shape, or form.
And I want the American public to know, right now, that we will not be intimidated. American patriots are fed up, with corruption from the local level, to the highest level of this government.
We are going to take this country back, and we are not going to be intimidated, we are not going to back down, we are going to clean this mess up now.
They were quite clear that they were providing an "opening statement," a summary, an overview for the press and the American people.
They were also clear that "evidence" and/or "proof" would be provided in court filings and presentations. They are lawyers, they are prosecutors, they are presenting a sensitive legal case. Does he expect them to do so in a press conference or even on "a full week" of Tucker Carlson Tonight?
Carlson is generally quite good, but he's on a slightly incorrect tangent (or expectation) here.
Tucker is like Bill Barr.... he started out saying what we want to hear and now he just blows his own pipes....
And that’s a bad thing...why?
Fox knows that Tucker is huge for ratings.
Although I guess ratings don’t mean much if you have no advertisers.
Tucker needs to find a new home.
‘
Hannity is mailing it in.
He had that mid-life change and boy, he changed.
He gets on and rattles the same sayings.
‘
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. The skepticism is natural, without the evidence she sounds like Jim Hoft.
“No, SHE has to prove it. She hasn’t. She can’t. She won’t.”
In my view She has to prove it or admit she was wrong. There is no walking away.
The question is when will she prove it. I understand holding your cards close, but she is stating some very big stuff here. A lot of people including me trust her on this.
If she does not prove what she stated in the different interviews she is ruin as a lawyer.
I like to think a high profile lawyer like her would not lie, so I am waiting for her statements to be proven.
If she can not prove it in court we need a real congressional investigation into the 2020 election. The country needs answers. The accusations has divided the country.
If her statements are false or have been mislead, the accusations has greatly hurt America’s democracy and ruin President Trump legacy.
This is a very high stakes games that has me very worried for our country. I think Tucker is worried too.
Tucker said UFOs are more believable than her vote machine claim.
‘
In what other TV segment does one need to prove X?
I’ve never seen it before. This is new.
Walk the plank hostility.
‘
“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”
Well stated
“she may have it and does not want it out in public ...or has not nailed it down yet”...
They would never have conducted the presser if they did not have rock-solid proof.
Giuliani told the MSM present that they have much evidence they will not release publicly until it gets to the Supreme Court. That they know no matter the proof the lower courts will reject nearly everything they present because they are politically motivated courts in those jurisdictions so, they will not reveal their evidence in totality until the right time. The media is outraged that they will not tip their hands in advance to the media and are throwing temper tantrums.
Faux News is compromised, don’t walk away, run!
With all due respect, I think Tucker is usually correct and talks about things that others not.
Like the struggle for the middle class.
He really cares about America. And her people.
They all said that. How did Carlson miss it?
It's actually kind of disingenuous of him. Why would he expect three experienced prosecutors to try their sensitive case on Tucker Carlson Tonight?
‘
They’re not extraordinary claims.
When you hate someone, you’ll do anything.
People daily call for Trump’s death and compare him to Hitler. When you vilify someone to this level, you will see people willing to do whatever it takes.
.
“I’ve never seen it before. This is new.”
I think it because the claim is so extraordinary and serious. If proven we can not trust our election system anymore. Down right scary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.