Posted on 11/13/2020 8:58:02 PM PST by ransomnote
How can you reason a person out of a position they did not arrive at using reason?
Ask him to tell you specifically why he likes Biden.
That would make more sense, because few would expect a bunch of US Army could singularly raid, at will, a foreign office building of any kind.
A tactical hysteria inducing story leaves droppings for the truth to come out, eventually, but *right on time*.
I like clocks.
For the last four years we’ve been told that foreign interference in our elections represents an existential threat to our democracy. Now we’re about to find out that foreign interference in our elections really isn’t that bad and we have no reason to be concerned about sending millions of votes overseas to be tallied.
.
I hope Mr. Wood and co. are looking into the vote totals. I have commented on this since the Election. No totals to be found. No comparison totals to be found(ie 2016). The MSM and DS think they got away with this. Prayers for Team Trump and the legal beagles.
https://meaninginhistory.blogspot.com/2020/11/larry-johnson-on-scytl-raid.html
Larry Johnson On The Scytl “Raid”
FTA:
The core of Johnson’s account is that the servers in question were not owned by private companies: Dominion or Scytl, or anyone else. Rather, they were owned by CIA. That, of course, would put an entirely different light on the legalities that would have been in play. If the Scytl facility were US government property, and if the personnel effecting the seizure of the servers were proceeding in accordance with valid orders, there would have been no need for German government involvement. Here’s how Johnson puts that:
I am reliably informed that a unit under the command of USEUCOM (i.e., United States European Command) did in fact conduct an operation to take control of computer servers. But these servers belong to the CIA, not Dominion or Sctyl. The U.S. military has full authority to do this because any CIA activity in the European theater is being conducted using military cover. In other words, CIA officers would be identified to the German government (and anyone else asking) as military employees or consultants.
This is, in concept, absolutely true. Again, the question remains, did this actually happen in the real world? Johnson says he has been “reliably informed” that it did.
Her website is www.defendingtherepublic.org.
Mark Steyn (subbing for Rush) just said they’ve been overwhelmed with hits from Rush listeners, so try again in an hour.
I don’t think they wanted us to know. They were gobsmacked by the numbers DJT was pulling in on election day. Instead of having to produce thousands of fake ballots, which they were prepared to do, they suddenly had too produce hundreds of thousands! Impossible to hide.
******************************************************************************************
Well, that’s one narrative, and it’s appeals to my confirmation bias, and is naturally what I thought at first.
However, upon further reflection, I thought maybe not.
The forces that want a color revolution depend on having a “disputed” election and an opposing group that is willing to Burn, Loot, Murder—ie violent opposition. So it seems to me, the obvious steal which results in a reversal in the courts is a perfect scenario for the results they want.
So while I prefer to believe that POTUS did so much better than they thought, I remain open to entertaining other theories.
~~~~~/~~~~~/~~~~~/~~~~/~~~~~/~~~~/~~~~~/~~~~~
it’s quite possible that the desire for a color revolution was there, and that they wanted a disputed election. I think Q may have given credence to that plan. But I think it’s also true that Trump did much, much better than they had planned. Thus, the scramble to get votes in the wee hours to even bring it close.
I really think that they didn’t think that Trump would be as popular as he was. And the continued rallies and parades for Trump have to be putting a chink in their armor. They might get really angry after the courts smack them down (and they danged well better), but they also know that there are a TON of actual Trump fans and we also are very angry. And, we know where they live.
I was thinking more like Eric or even Don Jr. running it. . . Eric always looks ready for a fight to me. Still, once I heard about that 150 B in dept... yeah, no thanks, nobody would want to take that on.
I’d like to know where AOC hangs out. Can we please have the anons look into that?
NOT VOUCHING FOR THIS BUT-ICYMI:
So what happened? I am reliably informed that a unit under the command of USEUCOM (i.e., United States European Command) did in fact conduct an operation to take control of computer servers.
But these servers belong to the CIA, not Dominion or Sctyl. The U.S. military has full authority to do this because any CIA activity in the European theater is being conducted using military cover. In other words, CIA officers would be identified to the German government (and anyone else asking) as military employees or consultants.
Such an operation would have been carried out with U.S. law enforcement present to take custody of the evidence. That means that the evidence will be under the control of the Department of Justice through US Attorneys and can be used in court or other judicial proceedings.
This is not the first time that a military unit attached to EUCOM has compelled a CIA computer facility to hand over evidence. A dear friend of mine (a retired DEA officer) told me about an incident where he entered a CIA facility in Frankfurt backed up by the US Army to get info the CIA was withholding (this took place in the 1980s).
NOTE: My internet is going on and off every 5-10 minutes. Almost seems like every time I find an interesting article about this and other election subjects. I’m sure it just seems that way.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMIQbsTfH3E&feature=emb_logo
New (since election) Juan O. Savin video.
No date on it that I can see. I am just starting to listen now.
I just finished listening to it. It is very interesting and encouraging. Juan sounds like a down-to-earth guy and a straight shooter.
His name is familiar to me, but I can’t place him.
What do we know about him?
Who is he exactly? Or rather, who do people theorize he is?
This is great. You are right; It is spot on. You should post it on the main board.
True these are not mutually exclusive theories. But after so many years, of practice, you’d think they could hide stealing better. spit.
Yep. Agreed.
Re Chelsea complaining about Trumpers in front of her mom’s house:
I see it more as a call out to minions to go beat the Trump supporters up!
He created an account for the election and complained a few times on air that Twitt still hadn’t given him a blue checkmark.
ICYMI: Sydney’s website regarding fraudulent election stated on Rush’s show:
defending the republic.org
I did a search and my computer blocks me from access to any of the possible links.
I did a search and my computer blocks me from access to any of the possible links.
I was redirected here https://ldfftar.org/
The Deep State is literally trying to take over the world as we speak, no different than Hitler. Frighteningly enough, they’re doing a rather good job of it.
That said...
Trump is in office, and the people that are trying to steal the election are the same folks that spit on the military and want to defund the police. These folks say that they intend on having Trump “removed” from office.
Oh really?
Don’t think anyone for a minute that the Supreme Court isn’t just itching to put all of this cheating down. The left isn’t REALLY trying to get Biden to be President...but they’ll be happy as hell if we let them. What they really seek is to undermine Trump’s second term and cause unrest. The SCOTUS is fully aware that a joke of an election that we are in the midst of will be the end of our Nation. Well, at least 5 of them will think that!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.