Posted on 11/11/2020 2:46:12 PM PST by Bigtigermike
Mr. President @realDonaldTrump & Mr. Biden @JoeBiden
Our analysis in Michigan indicates a computer algorithm was likely used to transfer 69,000 votes. We are willing to subject our results to a critical & transparent review with your representatives. Are you open?
-Dr. Shiva
Sharp factual presentation- would stand up in court in a presentation too.
1 for you 1000 for us , 0 for you 69000 for us
This guy was a candidate for the GOP nomination for the Senate in MA.
Not exactly “unbiased.”
Smart guy, but come on.
Did this affect the US Senate race as well, or were these Biden only ballots (or do we know)?
Dr Shiva Ayyadurai thinks he invented email.
Not the kinda of science the Rats care about.
Note that if you take 69K from Biden and give to Trump that is a 138,000 vote swing.
Presentation was incredibly interesting.
Yes it is but still not enough for the win.
Big surprise to see an MIT prof. making this claim, and suggesting it will endure rigorous legal scrutiny in court . The seeds of doubt regarding this election are taking root and far more pervasive than expected. Well beyond just the “pede” crowd.
Well, it’s 68 k taken from Trump and added to Biden- so 139,000 vote change.
Also, they only looked at four counties. They didn’t look at the whole state.
“Not exactly “unbiased.” Smart guy, but come on.
Clearly you didn’t watch the video, if you had, you would see that his partner in the study who is explaining the fraud is a self-proclaimed registered Democrat.
something else to keep in mind:
SCYTL: Partners
#1 MICROSOFT
Working closely with Microsoft, Scytl looks to help electoral and government organizations across the globe implement Smart Governance solutions for Smart Cities, Smart provinces, Smart Counties and Smart Countries.
https://www.scytl.com/en/partners/
OK. Shiva is unbiased and the inventor of email.
We’ve put up with his crap for year in MA. He belongs on Alex Jones. Not in a court. He wouldn’t make it through the doors of an election dispute courtroom.
We have to be able to do better than this guy.
Is the argument mathematically valid? And if it is biased, why invite representatives from both parties?
Also, I clearly recall this guy being labeled a RINO, among other things (some not so nice) right here on this site. If so, then shouldn’t he be helping the other guy? After all, we all know RINOs aren’t just people that disagree with us, but actual traitorous moles! Enemies within!
Unfortunately not enough Republicans will understand exactly how the election was stolen from them...
Someone should explain in layman’s terms...
We need 71 Million voters objecting loudly about their stolen vote...
“Dr Shiva Ayyadurai thinks he invented email.”
—
Twist ending - he invented it before Al Gore invented the internet! Amazing what can be done during lulls at the 7-11.
“Also, they only looked at four counties. They didn’t look at the whole state.”
Sounds like they are confirming the Dominion ‘glitch’. The hand counts will validate the extent of the tally-tampering via computer algorithm.
I think we’ll find this algorithm was used in all Blue-controlled swing states, MI, WI and PA. The hand count,canvass and audit in GA will expose if it was used beyond that extensively.
“Yes it is but still not enough for the win.”
It’s darn close, and only 4 counties of 47 using those machines. And if the same was done to the Senate candidate, James, it would flip that seat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.