Posted on 11/05/2020 5:51:50 PM PST by OL Hickory
I am hearing about a watermark on the official ballots... so I grabbed my Gemscope and took a look.
Got it. I see it too.
The ballots are printed by the local county election commissioner.
There is no such thing as an “official federal ballot.”
The fricking watermark (if it exist) won’t be on the peel of tabs that go home / get thrown in the trash.
An image of the “water mark” was displayed on Alex Jones... its not the same... not little dots.
Not so sure this watermark stuff is true.
Besides... they dont even need it to prove fraud.
Each state is different—ballots are printed by states.
I say hoax. Wish it were true. But states run their own elections.
So what good would a watermark do? Endless ways to cheat with real ballots....
Freeper from California mentioned that he got a ballot in the mail but voted in person. When he did that, he wasn’t required to hand in the ballot he received in the mail and he could have voted twice. What good would that have done if both of them were watermarked?
(the yellow dots below are the watermaker)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_Identification_Code
I also say hoax but wouldnt it be great if this was done by the raw paper manufacturer
Not necessarily. I worked for a printing company in Delaware County PA in the 80’s and 90’s. We had the contract for printing:
- Voting machine ballots (voting machines were the old-style ones with levers)
- Absentee ballots
- Sample ballots for both parties
We had the contracts for printing them for all four of PA’s suburban Philly counties:
- Delaware
- Montgomery
- Chester
- Bucks
Data entry and printing of the ballots were separately contracted out to private companies. The data entry company would call us when the data was ready and they’d ship it to us on a 9-track reel tape.
To say the data that we got from the data entry company was garbage would be an understatement:
- Candidates under the wrong office in certain precincts
- Entire parties transposed in certain precincts
- Misspellings everywhere
- County-wide candidates entirely missing in certain precincts
Most of our software was dedicated to flagging and correcting these errors.
really? do you really need to be slow walked thru something so simple?
the machine-id on a ballot would have to match up with the list of approved printers
any ballots with machine-ids not on that list would be fraudulent
I should point out that I was one of two people who wrote the software code.
Why do people think these ballots are fake? I think they’re 100% real. With mail in ballots, you don’t need to fake them. Mail in your ballot and then show up to the polls and vote.
All the pollster has to do is ‘forget’ to mark your name as voted.
100% Untraceable
The watermark would probably encompass the entire sheet of paper, including the tab that is supposed to be removed prior to submission.
Jay Sekulow says this:
In the last 24 hours, we have determined that these issues should be raised directly with your local or state party office since they are now in the best position to take immediate action with the appropriate authorities in your state.
As a resource, we have compiled a list of the election hotline numbers in each of the 50 states and that is available here: https://aclj.org/us-constitution/voter-fraud-election-hotline. If you continue to see any suspicious activity, continue to have issues with your specific matter, or have questions about voter fraud and intimidation, please call the number for your state available at this link: https://aclj.org/us-constitution/voter-fraud-election-hotline.
Yes. It would be great. Id be thrilled to be wrong and feel like an idiot.
Paging Doug Vogt.. Printer, paper, ink expert!
I think you missed my point.... how does that solve the problem outlined by the Freeper from California that I mentioned....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.