Replies

Thanks for the ping.

I checked it out. It looks plausibly legit. If there were any signs of speculation or hoax play, I wouldn’t say it looked plausibly legitimate.

However, this is a leak of sorts and I question this sort of channeling of what seems to be classified information.

If the sting is not just plausibly legitimate but actually legitimate, there would be court filings perhaps under seal with warrants for arrest issued. I don’t think leaks would be made if it’s a military op.

There are questions of legitimate authority, by what authority does the President’s EO extend to ballot design selection? The answer is National Security. Ballots like currency must have shape and form with choices for watermarks and color/tint. This should fall under anti-counterfeit measures for election ballots.

States must have signed an agreement to comply (my speculation). If traitors were in state positions of authority for agreeing to compliance, they would have gladly signed the agreement after thinking the ballots were easy to counterfeit. This was the lure. Comply and cheat at the same time, or so they would think.

The choices were given to Secretaries of States and were provided by DHS as a measure of compliance with National Security orders.

A Chinese spy group would see how easy it would be to counterfeit chosen designs, watermarks, color/tint as the specifications were explicit in the choices given.

It appears that DHS retained the sole authority to make the paper ballots according to the choices made by states. The watermark choices were to lure in states to think this was a security requirement by DHS and must be complied with.

This was key. It was critical to get states to comply and at the same time to let Chinese spy and other enemy groups think the ballot features were easy to counterfeit.

But DHS secretly added more features such as non-radioactive isotopes (chemical tracers) that states were unaware of.

Here’s a synopsis of what went down:

1. DHS under the President’s EO for national security worked from 2017 through 2020 to bring states into ballot compliance based on National Security orders.

2. States took delivery of federally produced ballots and agreed to use only these federal ballots to be in compliance meanwhile thinking they were easy to defeat through counterfeit printing.

3. The President spoke in public warning that China was going to counterfeit tens of millions of ballots and attempt to steal the election.

4. The actual federal ballots were discernible and traceable from the counterfeit ballots.

Now questions are how would this emerge and be seen as a legitimate prosecution? How does DOJ and the Administration retain moral authority in the face of accusations made against them of interference and partisan motives?

If it’s taken to court and proven, the accused will have their day in court.

If all the above is accurate, we should have an announcement by DOJ soon.

Adding a little more to the analysis in #1070 above:

The President's PR Release:

In anticipation of foreign and domestic election interference, on September 12, 2018, President Donald J. Trump signed Executive Order 13848 on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election.

This will be going to the US Supreme Court before December 8 I believe. Dec 8 is when Elector's conference convenes, Dec 14 is when they vote.

President Trump has never been observed to back down from critical events, has he?

I think I am starting to understand why it's taking so long to complete the last little bit of counting. Have you wondered why it's taking so long?

Taking extra time for them to get the fake votes in?

True but maybe more than that. A court case after Dec 14 loses leverage. There can be no court case if the outcome is still uncertain. The traitors are running out the clock?

Ok, I'll pray for us and our country. There will be a recount. The fake ballots will be thrown out. The US Supreme Court will rule the fake ballots may be taken out. I pray this happens.