Sorta.
The Founders wanted you to own an M-4, or an M-16, or a M-249 SAW.
Or an RPG or an ATGM or a MANPAD.
They intended us to be armed, at a minimum, like light infantry.
EXACTLY
The argument can also be made that If I can afford an F-35 or Apache helicopter, I should be able to have that as well - per the Constitution.
Bingo!
In the 18th century, ther term "arms" was universally understood to mean the weapons of a foot soldier or mounted cavalry.
"Armaments" described heavier naval or horse-drawn weapons like cannon and mortars.
Sort of... IF we wanted to participate in our various State militia's... they expected you to show up with at least Light-Infantrymen's load-out.
NO POWER was given to the FedGov, or to the States, to limit our RKBA in any way.
So... Battleships, fighter/bomber aircraft, full-auto, orbital coherent-antimatter death rays, ect... All the way up to John Wick's pencil...
Lexington & Concord. Do they still teach about those events?