Q Anon: 10/08/20 Trust Trump's Plan ~ Vol.293, Q Day 1077

qalerts.app ^ | 10/08/20 | FReepers and FReeQs, vanity

[bagster]

Haha. Q beat me again. I think I'll go do laundry.

Wasn't referring to Kansas' statement re: Clinton emails.
Q

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Looking back, the word “everything” might be important.

[TruthWillWin]

So, wait. Is Q saying not to believe what Pompeo said, or using what Pompeo said to illustrate not to believe all the other crap being written. Including the Axios article.

Think 4843 was referring to the news about Barr/Durham saying no indictments before election. Was that the Axios article?

[bagster]

No one should be offended...he is from Queens after all.

I'm certainly not offended.

Never trust a man who doesn't use the f**k word, I always say.

[TangoLimaSierra]

When do we riot?

You mean we haven't started?
Dammit! Now I have to go back to Walmart and apologize.

But I'm keeping the big screen.

[bagster]

I'm thinking that he was referring to the Axios article about no 'report' before the election.

Which makes me think that Q knows what's up, and there WILL be indictments before the election.

Make it so. I so want to see the looks on the faces of the nattering nabobs beyond the trees. They're throwing a hate Barr party out there.

They are celebrating the demise of Q and even called me out my name when I wasn't even on their gay ass threads.

It makes sense that Q would respond to the Axios article. Its very bad for morale.

[bagster]

Was that the Axios article?

Yes it was.

[bitt]

I’m thinking something else is out there (or, coming) that we should not believe.”
~~~~~

maybe that refers to what the Scaramooch was tricked into saying, “that there’s something big coming along for Trump”

[bitt]

FUNNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[bagster]

maybe that refers to what the Scaramooch was tricked into saying, “that there’s something big coming along for Trump”

Hmmm, could be.

But he said it in a post that included something (Clinton emails) being released before the election.

So I associate his comment about not believing everything you read with something being released (by our guys) before the election.

My money's on the Axios article.

#ShinyNickel

[pgkdan]

So, wait. Is Q saying not to believe what Pompeo said, or using what Pompeo said to illustrate not to believe all the other crap being written. Including the Axios article.

I think the latter is what he means. I'm thinking we can expect something soon on the beast lady's emails.

[bagster]

Sidenote:

Q would post the best one in forever (they have the Clinton emails) right when I'm trying to watch the latest episode of 'The Boys'.

Way to ruin my life, Q.

[AZLiberty]

"And why she wore a blouse with little white hats on it to the SOTU"

Haspel is a derp, but I suspect a well-leveraged derp. Trump has it all, including the nefarious doings of the London field office while Haspel headed it.

Trump has the unenviable job of totally rebuilding several airplanes while in flight, including the CIA, the FBI, the DOJ, and the DOD. He can no more shut them down than a major city can shut down its police department, so he has to continue using them while gradually replacing top leadership and totally revising their organizational cultures.

Only Trump could make this happen.

[generally]

The prevailing theory seems to be that the pardons are filed somewhere in the Presidential Library of the President who issued them.

I have no idea if that’s true or not.

But wasn’t there a raid on 0vomit’s or Klintoon’s library a while back? It seems like there was something like that going on.

Anyway, all speculation until we get some facts.

[prairie dog]

Would the drop of frazzledrip from Weiner’s laptop outrank the drop of Hillary’s emails?

[stylin19a]

might have been referring to this in the article:

"Earlier Friday, it emerged that Barr had been warning Republicans that a review of the FBI’s Russia probe would not be finalized until after the Nov. 3 election."

[LonePalm]

There is a BIG problem with using a US ship or submarine to shoot a missile at a civilian aircraft. It's called the CREW. The captain can not do this alone. He may give the command but he doesn't do the targeting or firing. There are other officers and enlisted that do the actual work.

You can NOT launch a missile from a ship/sub without EVERYONE onboard knowing about it. Trust me on this one. Even putting a war shot on active for vertical launch would be a memorable moment for everyone in CIC.

Do you really think that everyone onboard would be silent if their ship/sub was involved in an attack on POTUS? I don't.

Then there is the little problem of accounting for the expended missile. I imagine that there would be some pretty serious inquiry following an attack on POTUS whether successful or not.

The enlisted members might be legally shielded from obeying an illegal order but any other officer involved would not be. They are expected to know what is an illegal order and not to follow it.

Not on my watch, not on my ship, not in my Navy.

WWG1WGA

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

[MileHi]

...or using what Pompeo said to illustrate not to believe all the other crap being written. Including the Axios article.

I'm going with that for now.

[generally]

See Q 4844.

(Not that that really clears it up.)

[bagster]

Sweet mother of mercy.

Out beyond the trees just found out that they have the missing Clinton emails, and they still have room to bitch about nothing happening.

I'm really starting not to like them dopes.

Did we know that Pompeo had the emails before today?

This is beyond yuge and bigly.