Thanks. I may give Q a second (make that 15th) chance, but mainly because the media and Congress are so opposed now. But the record on the big items (such as the initial claim Clinton would be arrested the next day) still aren’t good.
Later.
You raise a good point and I’ve been wondering about that first post for a long time, as it’s so uncharacteristically predictive.
In the posts since that first one, Q has largely been using the Socratic approach to information dissemination (ask questions that require us to go research). So now I’m wondering if that post wasn’t made simply to get everybody’s attention.
1. Q did NOT claim Clinton would be arrested. He reposted someone else’s post that said Clinton would be arrested. (Look carefully at Q drop and you’ll see it’s a post that references some earlier post.)
2. No year in the arrest date. Leaves open the possibility that it could be this year (or not).
I honestly do NOT expect a big arrest before the election. Because it would be a giant monkey wrench in the election. But since I have been so consistently wrong about guessing when something like that would happen (so many times I thought it was imminent!), perhaps I am wrong again and since I think it won’t happen, it will.
:: such as the initial claim Clinton would be arrested the next day) still aren’t good. ::
You really don’t understand autists, do you?
Why would a MILOPS command choose to engage a hive mind of “autistic” internet brooders?
What is special about autists, as a group?
Think focus effort.
Think decoding.
Think risk taking.
Ever ask a functioning autist (Asperger’s for example) for their opinion on something?
Did you walk away shaking your head?
Now, believe this: Everyone falls somewhere in the autistic spectrum.
There is no “non-Autistic”.
What does this rambling screed have to do with Hillary not being arrested?
MILOPS tossed a brick through the front window of the Intelligence Army of Northern Virginia.
He got their attention.
Hive mind.