Proceed with the lawsuit!
I teach at a public school and saw a kid with a “straight pride” shirt.
Pretty funny, actually.
"Support Metro Weekly's LGBTQ Journalism For as Little as $1.15 a Week"
No surprises here...
METRO WEEKLY Washington's LGBTQ Magazine P.O. Box 11559 Washington, DC 20008
Next week send her to skool with a “Kill A Commie For Mommy” t-shirt.
New car(s), house and church fellowship hall in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ......
Public schools are sewers
Wanting supremacy, extra rights and privileges is not equality. Someone that has an intense irrational fear of something, is not going to wear it on their own tshirt. This phobia bullshit irritates the hell out of me. If they’re going to send her home with that, their pride shirts shouldn’t be allowed either.
Anyone who labels a person "homophobic" for opposing homosexuality should be charged with slander or libel. And the "hate group" is one that does so.
A phobia denotes fear of something, in this case ‘homophobic’ would denote a fear of homosexuals, and of homosexual attraction and relations, and or of becoming a homosexual.
However, even though some person’s opposition to homosexuality and all that entails may be driven by that fear, yet the term is broadly used in the pejorative to label any and all who disagree with or oppose homosexuality and its relations, or even those who refuse to affirm the same.
And as such this use is not accurate but is a psychological tactic designed to place opposition on the defensive as being driven by an irrational fear, and thus silence opposition. Which tactic is actually just what the playbook of “After the Ball” advocated long ago.[1]Their strategy was based on the premise that,
"In any campaign to win over the public, Gays must be portrayed as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to adopt the role of protector. The purpose of victim imagery is to make straight people feel very uncomfortable….our effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic, or proof.”
As clearly taught in the Bible, God made man and women distinctively different yet uniquely compatible and complementary, and only joined them together in marriage - as the Lord Jesus Himself specified (Mt. 19:4–6) - and only condemned homosexual relations wherever they are manifestly dealt with
et there is still room at the cross for all who will come to God in repentance and faith, and trust in the Divine Son of God sent by the Father, the risen Lord Jesus, to save them on His account, by His sinless shed blood, and thus be baptized and live for Him. (Acts 10:36-47) Thanks be to God.
Horrid biased writing. Just the fact he writes “daughter’s HOMOPHOBIC t-shirt” shows that.
Again, as I’ve always said, it’s about the adjectives they stick in.
Meanwhile, I’m sure they zero problem with the disgusting “NO LIVES MATTER UNTIL BLACK LIVES MATTER”.
“He seemed perplexed as to why Melton would allow the sticker, but not his daughter’s homophobic t-shirt,”
Nothing to be perplexed about. With lefties, free speech applies only to them.
The quotation isn’t homophobic, it is instructive.
Bump
***Homophobic***(?)
No one is scared pf a bunch of queers. Homomisia is a better word, a revulsion of homos.
Same for islamophobia. Islammisia is better.
I learned that word from another FReeper.
The queers have hijacked the word “gay”. They have absolutely polluted it and monopolized it for their exclusive use. To refer to a queer as “gay” is a misnomer to the nth degree. I have never met a queer that was happy, or content, or at peace with himself/herself. They have always been miserable people and they are helpless to hide their misery. If the author of the article thinks that he pastor and his daughter are homophobic, then perhaps the author can agree with Christians that the supreme homophobic is God.
Well, it is.
What a whiner!
Your the one who turned your daughter over to Lucifer’s disciples...
What did you expect?
Your daughter should be suing you for criminal child endangerment...