Remember when the NYT ran a story questioning how Nominee John Roberts was able to adopt 2 Irish children, when foreign adoptions of Irish children was illegal. They uncovered that the adoption transaction was routed through South America, where the children were transported and then brought to the USA. Then suddenly, the NYT retracted the story and appologized, citing privacy, the importance of keeping adoption records confidential, and of course, protecting the children.
I’m guessing ACB gets no such consideration, and they will demand full disclosure. They might even drag out a fake mother to claim the children were hers, and were stolen from her. Stop the confirmation! We need FBI investigations!
The question is, why did they let Roberts off the hook when they pretty much had him dead to rights?
I was thinking the same thing - wouldn't be beyond them to pull such crap. Or worse yet, they could find the actual birth mother, pay her a hefty sum to make that claim and claim DNA evidence to back it up. After what they did to Kavanaugh I won't put it past them.