Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Researchers Discover Nanoscale Catalyst to Efficiently Convert CO2 Into Ethylene
SciTechDaily ^ | 09/19/2020 | UCLA

Posted on 09/20/2020 9:49:37 PM PDT by BenLurkin

A research team from Caltech and the UCLA Samueli School of Engineering has demonstrated a promising way to efficiently convert carbon dioxide into ethylene — an important chemical used to produce plastics, solvents, cosmetics and other important products globally.

The scientists developed nanoscale copper wires with specially shaped surfaces to catalyze a chemical reaction that reduces greenhouse gas emissions while generating ethylene — a valuable chemical simultaneously. Computational studies of the reaction show the shaped catalyst favors the production of ethylene over hydrogen or methane. A study detailing the advance was published in Nature Catalysis.

Currently, ethylene has a global annual production of 158 million tons. Much of that is turned into polyethylene, which is used in plastic packaging. Ethylene is processed from hydrocarbons, such as natural gas.

Using copper to kick start the carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction into ethylene reaction (C2H4) has suffered two strikes against it. First, the initial chemical reaction also produced hydrogen and methane — both undesirable in industrial production. Second, previous attempts that resulted in ethylene production did not last long, with conversion efficiency tailing off as the system continued to run.

To overcome these two hurdles, the researchers focused on the design of the copper nanowires with highly active “steps” — similar to a set of stairs arranged at atomic scale. One intriguing finding of this collaborative study is that this step pattern across the nanowires’ surfaces remained stable under the reaction conditions, contrary to general belief that these high energy features would smooth out. This is the key to both the system’s durability and selectivity in producing ethylene, instead of other end products.


(Excerpt) Read more at scitechdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: catalyst; co2; energy; ethylene; hydrocarbons; maga; nanoscale; opec
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 09/20/2020 9:49:37 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

phew, just in time, the world was just about ready to burst into flames in 11 more years- /s


2 posted on 09/20/2020 9:56:42 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Whelp, here comes the ice age.


3 posted on 09/20/2020 9:58:52 PM PDT by calenel (Don't panic. Prepare and be vigilant. Join the war effort. On the human side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
No mention of the fact that this would have to be an endothermic process - i.e., require the input of energy.

Regards,

4 posted on 09/20/2020 10:08:25 PM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

Thank you!


5 posted on 09/20/2020 10:20:16 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

Huh.

The anti-carbonists get their way with things and we can say bye bye to agriculture.

Crops need CO2 to flourish.


6 posted on 09/20/2020 10:45:27 PM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Ethylene production: Intellectually interesting, if it’s economical.

Should have gone for producing ethanol, liquor is quicker...


7 posted on 09/20/2020 10:51:49 PM PDT by mrsmith (US MEDIA: " Every 'White' cop is a criminal! And all the 'non-white' criminals saints!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ..
Using copper to kick start the carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction into ethylene reaction (C2H4) has suffered two strikes against it. First, the initial chemical reaction also produced hydrogen and methane — both undesirable in industrial production. Second, previous attempts that resulted in ethylene production did not last long, with conversion efficiency tailing off as the system continued to run.
So, I wonder, how much hydrogen, how much methane? Both can power fuel cells.

8 posted on 09/20/2020 10:55:12 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

So we’re going to spend tons of money and use lots of energy to reduce a relatively infinitesimal amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, producing ethylene, “a valuable chemical” whose major use is the in the production of plastic. Sounds good to me.


9 posted on 09/20/2020 10:57:39 PM PDT by norcal joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
Aw, but it’s “efficient”. They just don’t say what it is efficient compared to.
10 posted on 09/20/2020 11:47:05 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: norcal joe

That sure would be some expensive polyethylene made out of carbon dioxide.

Never mind the fact that they are way, way overstating the amount of carbon dioxide they claim is in the atmosphere.


11 posted on 09/20/2020 11:48:33 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Grimmy

i put the /s tag on- AOC says world gonna end in 10 years- due to CO2-

She’s nuts-


12 posted on 09/21/2020 12:17:21 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: calenel

My thoughts exactly. The idea that we know enough to know what the appropriate level of CO2 is, to go monkeying with levels, seem extremely hubristic. We’ve had a quarter century of not funding anyone with contrary, heretical views on the subject.


13 posted on 09/21/2020 2:22:09 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“We are at the brink of fossil fuel exhaustion, coupled with global climate change challenges”

opening statements like that pretty much destroy any credibility for the rest of the article ...


14 posted on 09/21/2020 2:56:23 AM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Fake News. They lie by omission. They omitted the fact that this process requires energy, far more than was used when oxidizing the carbon. It takes more energy to create each ethylene molecule than was created by burning the Carbon that produced the CO2. Even with a 100 percent efficient catalyst, it would take just as much energy as was used in the burning. A catalyst can’t create energy.


15 posted on 09/21/2020 2:59:22 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Calm down and enjoy the ride, great things are happening for our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Researchers Discover Nanoscale Catalyst to Efficiently Convert CO2 Into Ethylene
They’ve killed two birds with one stone: ridding the bounteous Earth of hated CO2 and ugly vegetation, while making fuel for cars to run on. Absolutely Brilliant!™


16 posted on 09/21/2020 3:11:46 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grimmy

Crops need CO2 to flourish.

And we need the oxygen the crops produce to breathe


17 posted on 09/21/2020 3:13:15 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

How about planting trees?


18 posted on 09/21/2020 3:45:57 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

I got that. I didn’t mean to sound pedanticy.

It’s fun to get into leftists faces and scream at them about why they hate plants so much they want them all to suffocate.


19 posted on 09/21/2020 4:47:41 AM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage

Just because a chemical process takes a net energy input to create a desired end product doesn’t mean it’s not a valuable process. Depending on the source hydrocarbon a gallon of gasoline in its final RON 90 form takes anywhere from 1.25 to 1.5 gallons of gas equivalent in energy on a BTU in to BTU out basis. If the input energy is cheaper than the output products value it doesn’t matter what the energy balance is. Gasoline is hydrocracked using steam methane reformed hydrogen and process heat from much cheaper natural gas to make a much higher value liquid no one cares that cracking heavy visbreak or vaccum resid using anywhere from 25 to 75% of the final BTU value in the finished gallon in $1.50 or less per MMBTU in natural gas. All that matters is that the input energy costs are less than what the finished product will sell for. Propylene is a high value petrochemical if the cost of cheap natural gas or even nuclear energy is less per unit of CO2 cracked into finshed propylene then it doesn’t matter one hoot that the process consumes energy. Many MANY industrial processes consume massive amounts of energy to make a higher value end product. I’m a petroleum geologist and also a engineer by degrees we see every day at the refinery energy being consumed to make a end product.


20 posted on 09/21/2020 4:53:20 AM PDT by JD_UTDallas ("Veni Vidi Vici")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson