Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dwight Eisenhower Set Precedence For Making Recess Appointment to High Court
Various course confirm this action ^ | 9/20/20 | OneVike

Posted on 09/20/2020 7:45:54 AM PDT by OneVike

Should Follow The Eisenhower Precedence

New Jersey judge William J. Brennan was appointed to the Supreme Court by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956 through a recess appointment. This was done in part with an eye on the presidential campaign that year;

On September 7, 1956, Sherman Minton announced his intent to retire in a letter to President Dwight D. Eisenhower, and he served until October 15, 1956. Now Eisenhower was running for reelection, and his advisors thought it would be politically advantageous to place a northeastern Catholic on the court. With the Senate already adjourned, Eisenhower made a recess appointment of William J. Brennan to the Court. After Eisenhower was sworn in for his second term in 1957, Brennan was formally nominated to the Court and confirmed in 1957.

So I advise Trump to make a recess appointment rot fill the vacant seat and let the chips fall where they may next year after Congress and Trump are all sworn in.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: recessappointment; supremecourt; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
If any Republican RINO's stand in the way, which looks like they are, then Trump needs to do what the left tried to convince Obama to do. We must fight fire with fire, or we will lose.
1 posted on 09/20/2020 7:45:54 AM PDT by OneVike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Certainly precedent for doing it. Let’s hope get better than Brennan.


2 posted on 09/20/2020 7:49:38 AM PDT by cdcdawg (Biden has dementia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike
Dwight Eisenhower Set Precidence Precedent For Making Recess Appointment to High Court

Regards,

3 posted on 09/20/2020 7:51:38 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Let’s not be defeatist and assume we won’t quickly get a nominee confirmed PERMANENTLY. Try that first AND TRY IT FORCEFULLY.


4 posted on 09/20/2020 7:52:29 AM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

A recess appointment only lasts until the end of the current Senate session. Appointing a USSC justice to serve until December 31st does nothing except help get through any election-related cases that may come up.


5 posted on 09/20/2020 7:54:19 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (“There’s somebody new and he sure ain’t no rodeo man.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike
This sounds like the best choice under the circumstances.However,after a sort search I couldn't find out what happens after the recess appointment.I assume he/she would,at some point,be required to pass the Senate's scrutiny as would occur with an “ordinary” nomination but,if that's true,when would it occur? Six months? A year?
6 posted on 09/20/2020 7:55:22 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Thanks To Biden Voters Oregon Is Now A Battleground State!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

So I advise Trump to make a recess appointment rot fill the vacant seat and let the chips fall where they may next year”

No. We will be lucky to hold the Senate with all the BS the rats are getting away with. We have a chance to replace a radical who hated the Constitution with a conservative. It is a once in a decade chance.


7 posted on 09/20/2020 7:55:57 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

I don’t understand why this whole thing, including hearings & votes, can’t be done in a week or less...???

Maybe, there are parliamentary rules meant to slow things down?


8 posted on 09/20/2020 7:59:22 AM PDT by MCEscherHammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

This plan of action is a waste pf time and argument. The House can prevent the Senate from recessing. So this can’t happen.

The 50’s were a different time, before Ted Kennedy and Chuck Schumer (the two confirmation militants) were in the Senate.


9 posted on 09/20/2020 7:59:24 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

Yes I caught that too late. I should be better at proof reading, but from time too time I still make mistakes


10 posted on 09/20/2020 8:00:00 AM PDT by OneVike (Just another Christian waiting to go home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

It’s no way to flush out the Rino’s.


11 posted on 09/20/2020 8:00:04 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OneVike
Wow. Very interesting.

Brennan was one of the worst justices ever appointed, as I recall.

12 posted on 09/20/2020 8:03:10 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg
Let’s hope get better than Brennan

It's sickening how often we don't. Stevens, Souter, ROberts might be better, but only slightly, the jury is still out on Gorsuch...

13 posted on 09/20/2020 8:05:19 AM PDT by Gil4 (And the trees are all kept equal by hatchet, ax and saw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

True, but Trump is better than Eisenhower was. He couldn’t get what he wanted so he just capitulated and went out and instead spent most his time playing golf. Kind of reminds you of how Arnie was when he couldn’t get things done with Democrats in CA. Trump is a fighter and he knows who he wants.


14 posted on 09/20/2020 8:10:18 AM PDT by OneVike (Just another Christian waiting to go home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Walter Brennan would have made a better Justice....having played Judge Roy Bean.


15 posted on 09/20/2020 8:26:08 AM PDT by Covenantor (We are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who can not govern. " Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

“A recess appointment only lasts until the end of the current Senate session. Appointing a USSC justice to serve until December 31st does nothing except help get through any election-related cases that may come up.”

Nothing stops Trump from working to formally place a nominee on the Court at the same that a recess appointment is seated, as far as I know, and per the article - so we get the best of both worlds, the seat is filled with our guy to see us through the election, and perhaps, hopefully, Trump is able to seat a permanent person early.


16 posted on 09/20/2020 8:34:40 AM PDT by BobL (I shop at Walmart and eat at McDonald's, I just don't tell anyone, like most here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Why risk turning the seat over to the Marxists next year?


17 posted on 09/20/2020 8:36:08 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

The best of both worlds is a permanent placement on the court before the election.


18 posted on 09/20/2020 8:36:58 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MCEscherHammer

The Turtle could change whatever parliamentary rules he and his GOP colleagues would like.

Will Chamberlain is an attorney who has been advocating on Twitter that since Trump’s nominee will presumably already been through hearings and a vote in the Senate that they shouldn’t need to go through hearings again.


19 posted on 09/20/2020 8:39:28 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

The Senate does not go into formal recess anymore. Both the House and Senate hold pro forma sessions that prevent the President from making recess appointments.


20 posted on 09/20/2020 8:41:28 AM PDT by kristinn (Serving ten to life in paradise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson