So she didn’t work in the Wuhan lab?
All I want to know.
More credible than anyone from a group run or.funded by he who must not be named.
Employed by Bannon Affiliate. So what? She has to work for somebody to support herself. Think a whistleblower on Coronavirus will be welcomed by CDC, NIH, WHO, Gates Foundation or Big Pharma?
Business Stuff == BS
Do they ever give investment advice I wonder?
Right. The gain-of-function virus research being done by Fauci and Gates in the US became illegal or unsupported during Obama reign. Fauci and co., then moved the whole show to the Wuhan lab. From their it got released...
Wake up people. Don’t drink kool-aid.
Yahoo will always take the word of their CCP paymasters over any American.
“”She’s authored peer-reviewed papers on coronavirus transmission in both Nature Magazine and The Lancet. Those are two of the most respected publications in all of science. Her paper on the origin of COVID-19, which she has published online, is not frivolous. In it, she points to specific evidence for the claims that she makes. She identifies so-called cut sites which are frequently used in genomic engineering that would allow scientists to swap in sequences from other viruses to create what she described last night as a Frankenstein bioweapon.”
https://www.foxnews.com/media/tucker-facebook-censor-chinese-virologist
“Some members of the Trump administration have pushed a fringe theory ...”
Unlike the totally accurate numbers and projections about the virus from people like Anthony Fauci. Or the non-fringe theory that “Russian hackers” got Trump elected. Or the non-fringe theory that Trump ... something something ... Ukraine therefore, impeachment. Or the non-fringe theory that Biden is of sound mind and doesn’t have dementia (he does).
Yan and her coauthors work for groups cofounded by the former Trump strategist Steve Bannon. He directed the groups before his arrest in August.
hmmmm
1. She has worked WITH the group in question, not FOR the group.
2. The question is not who the group is supported by. The only question is the scientific validity of the study she has been a part of.
3. Such studies need to be judged on their own scientific merits, It should not matter who the “messenger” is.
4. The media is trying to denigrate the study and any report on it, merely because some connection to Bannon, and never looking at whether the study has scientific validity.
So? Bannon apparently did their jobs for them.
They never seem to point out who is funded by Soros.
So what? More than half the U.S. government and all of the mainstream media work for Xi and Soros.
If this news is coming from Yahoo I don’t place much faith in it since their News is always biased so far to the left the its not believable.
I’ll look to another news site to verify that report.Until then its fiction in my mind.
Wow. Talk about blatant propaganda.
“A group of Chinese virologists released a strange new paper...”
Strange, HOW, Yahoo? Strange because it’s not the message your Chinese overlords want spread?
“One of the virologists, Li-Meng Yan, told the Fox News host Tucker Carlson it was a “man-made virus” that the Chinese government released “intentionally.””
Notice “man-made virus” and “intentionally” are in quotes, as if these are terms no reasonable human would possibly consider.
“Yan and her coauthors work for groups cofounded by the former Trump strategist Steve Bannon. He directed the groups before his arrest in August.”
So effing WHAT? Would she have more credibility if she worked for BLM or George Soros? Or would you prefer it she was unemployed, like most of the people who rely on your wretched propaganda service for “news”?
“Some members of the Trump administration have pushed a fringe theory that the virus accidentally leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China...”
Fringe because you don’t accept it, scumbabs.
“...but there’s no evidence of this.”
Yeah. Except an accredited Chinese virologist who says there IS ... oh, but, wait, she doesn’t count because she once worked for someone who’s not a communist.
When I listened to the interview, I did get the feeling she had been coached with the Falun Gong, Epoch Times, Gordon Chang, Steve Bannon, Guo Wengui propaganda points. It sounded just too much like their story line. Tip off, they always refer just to CCP, which most people would just say the Chinese government.
After I listened to the interview I actually googled her name and Falun Gong to see if she was a Falun Gong believer. Nothing shown though.
Maybe Aylin Woodward should go on Tucker Carlson’s show to give her rebuttal. I should check to see if we have popcorn ready first.
Does CCP run Yahoo?
They want to attach Steve Bannon as a measure of credibility in their own narrative?
We will attach Yahoo as a measure of credibility and, all the other demoncrat propagandist networks who are going to carry the same narrative too.
Fake news.
And so...?