Posted on 09/15/2020 3:51:23 PM PDT by ransomnote
McConnell: Trump’s Supreme Court nominee ‘will receive a vote on the floor of the United States Senate’ | Fox News https://t.co/mrZ5lWXLrZ— Karli 🇺🇸 (@KarluskaP) September 19, 2020
Ginsberg:
I wonder if they announced her death today in anticipation of Q’s post to watch events.
Perhaps the deep state used some ammo here.
A clear statement that Democrat mob rule and threats of violence will not deter the will of the people nor the intent of the Constitution. Thank you, @senatemajldr, for fearless leadership. pic.twitter.com/KX37N2SNDW— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) September 19, 2020
He may be Cocaine Mitch but he’s good to his word!
Thank you!
Thanks to you, I caught almost the entire rally.
RSBN is doing a great job. I thought the audio quality was better than usual tonight.
My friend just told me of the only case she knows of where Ginsburg voted with the correct side - it was a 5-4 decision stating that using thermal imaging to detect movements inside a house was a 4th amendment issue and required a warrant.
She told me that it was odd because Ginsberg sided with Scalia on that case.
Anybody remember this 5 days ago.
Very sad day today. We had to put Everest down after 14 great years. He was such a good boy and he protected Lisa with a level of ferocity that was precious while he loved just fooling around with me. RIP Ev who would always answer to the name Nvidia if you had a treat.Our pal
https://twitter.com/jimcramer/status/1305277618116349953?s=20
Demorats are between a rock and a hard place. If they balk at holding a nomination before the election - they won’t have the full court to take their argument that the election was fraudulent and Trump didn’t really win. If they allow the nomination, they lose the liberal side of the court, and when Trump wins, they still lose the liberal side of the court. HA HA HA
We just have to worry about the others...reading that the corn farmer is with Lisa & Co. on voting no.
This U.S. Senate should vote on President Trump's next nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court.— Martha McSally (@SenMcSallyAZ) September 19, 2020
That’s too close for comfort.
Let’s pray for rain
I noticed, too. He told the “visited DC 17 times” story and emphasized the 17 at least 3 times.
Then he went on to prominently mention a few other numbers. I have to go back and replay it, but iirc, one of the numbers was 128.
So I looked up Q128. It was posted on 11/09/2017. Has huge image which I will post in next post.
BREAKING: A high-level Romney insider tells me Mitt Romney has committed to not confirming a Supreme Court nominee until after Inauguration Day 2021. #Mittrevenge #utpol— Jim Dabakis (@JimDabakis) September 19, 2020
Q "Mr. President, just to clarify: Cristopher Wray — would you like to replace him, sir?"
THE PRESIDENT: "No, we’re looking at a lot of different things. And I don’t — I did not like his answers yesterday, and I’m not sure he liked them either. I’m sure that he probably would agree with me.:
"Antifa is bad — really bad. And if you look at it — who’s the big problem? The big problem is China. And we can have others also, and I’m not excluding anybody, but the big problem is China. And why he doesn’t want to say that, that certainly bothers me."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That doesn't sound like "a. Wray out." -- to me...
TXnMA
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.