Maybe more fuel efficient and thats great
But i see a lot of downsides, namely a much bigger footprint and target posibly a lot more places for airframe fatigue
At at speed they were a bitch to control. If it weren’ for Fly by technology the stealth V’s would be near impossible to control.
Not likely to have any structural fatigue issues since the fuselage is bearing the load. What I see wrong with the concept for a passenger version of the flying wing is turbulence. You’ll be bouncing around in that thing like a tennis ball with no flex to absorb the loads.
It’s a new fangled flying wing.
I only know bridge maintenance. A triangle is traditionaly a structural shape used in bridges. Compared to a cylinder....now we need some structural engineers. A modern airplan is a cylinder with a wing spar. A plane like this would be almost like three cylinders connected as a triangle shape. Might be structurally much stronger. Aerodynamics? Beyond me. Size and efficiency? Beyond me. interesting concept.