Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Secret Agent Man

Not likely to have any structural fatigue issues since the fuselage is bearing the load. What I see wrong with the concept for a passenger version of the flying wing is turbulence. You’ll be bouncing around in that thing like a tennis ball with no flex to absorb the loads.


21 posted on 09/05/2020 6:24:52 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Flinging poo is not a valid argument)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Organic Panic

I envision foamy rubber floors on huge rubber dampers then

Or shock absorbers on every row of seats

Flight attendants will really enjoy this


27 posted on 09/05/2020 6:36:18 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Organic Panic

What I see wrong with the concept for a passenger version of the flying wing is turbulence. You’ll be bouncing around in that thing like a tennis ball with no flex to absorb the loads.

Good point. In a conventional aircraft the wings absorb much of the turbulence like a dampening spring which reduces the turbulence experienced by passengers in the fuselage.


48 posted on 09/05/2020 7:36:53 PM PDT by Flick Lives (My work's illegal, but at least it's honest. - Capt. Malcolm Reynolds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson