Posted on 08/22/2020 2:19:30 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
Live Science contacted several scholars not affiliated with Garfinkel's work to get their thoughts on the Khirbet Qeiyafa head and Garfinkel's interpretation of it.
Most were unable to reply at press time. However, Oded Lipschits, an archaeologist at Tel Aviv University who co-directs excavations at Tell Moza, and Shua Kisilevitz, an archaeologist with the Israel Antiquities Authority and Tel Aviv University who excavates at Tell Moza, denounced the idea in a jointly written response.
"Although we cannot rule out the possibility that the human heads from Mo?a and Qeiyafa depicted gods, they have no markings, symbols or attributes -- such as horns, crescents, bulls -- found on figures and visual representations throughout the ancient Near East, that would identify them as divine figures. Furthermore, when gods were depicted on animals, they did not sit on them -- they do not need the transport -- they stood on them," Lipschits and Kisilevitz told Live Science in their response.
They also said that archaeological and historical research indicates that around 3,000 years ago Yahweh wasn't even worshipped in the region yet, much less was he the sole god of Israel.
(Excerpt) Read more at livescience.com ...
Well, if you're gonna shoot down my puns, my world will no longer make sense. /jk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.