Duh....
The headline is quite different from what the article says. Another AP fake news special?
Let me take out my Q decoder...
Oh, she's saying that we should "Trust Q".
Of course.
The article was referring to “America’s Newsroom” with Sandra Smith. And yes, the headline is certainly in agreement with the content of the article. Follow the link to read for yourself, if you’re in doubt or denial.
Also, from the White House press briefing yesterday,...
“Q Okay. And then I want to follow up with a question that I asked the President last week but he didn’t answer. I asked him about QAnon. So I wanted to know: Have you ever heard the President talk about QAnon? And what does he think of the conspiracy theory?
MS. MCENANY: No, I’ve never heard of that. There’s a lot of media focus on that, but certainly never heard of that from the President.”
See that here.
Press Briefing by Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany | 8/19/2020
whitehouse.gov ^ | Aug 19, 2020 | White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3876129/posts
You can dig all year, and you will not find a single post from Q where Q advocated violence against anyone. You can look at all 4600 plus Q drops and not find such an advocacy. Not once.
Trump’s answer, which doesn’t contradict what McEnany says here, was great.
When reminded by a reporter for NBC News that the movement’s followers believe he is fighting to stop a satanic cult of pedophiles and cannibals, he asked: “Is that supposed to be a bad thing?”
NBC thinks fighting to stop satanic pedophiles and cannibals would be bad.
Perfect response.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QAnon#Incidents
“Incidents” (long list and descriptions)
The posted article was removed from news, extended and elections and put into chat, even though it was front page at Fox News and important to the reelection of President Trump.
It’s clear Trump was backhandedly insulting QAnon. He said he liked that they supported him, he didn’t say he liked or agreed with the substance of it.