Posted on 08/12/2020 2:22:28 PM PDT by Olog-hai
The New York Times fawned over Sen. Kamala Harris, who Joe Biden picked to be his running mate, with a glowing front page on Wednesday featuring four separate headlines that political commentator Ben Shapiro and others characterized as drooling coverage over the addition to the Democratic ticket.
Shapiro shared an image of the front page sarcastically captioned, The NYT is definitely an unbiased source of news. Four headlines, all drooling.
As Shapiro pointed out, the front page features the headlines: Harris joins Biden ticket, achieving a first, Political warrior shaped by life in 2 worlds, Pick seen as safe but energizing and Woman of color in No. 2 slot of major party. [ ]
While the Times labeled Harris a pragmatic moderate, (The Hills media reporter Joe) Concha pointed out that the government watchdog GovTrack.us labels her as the most liberal Senator further to the left than Sen. Bernie Sanders, Concha said, because she has no bipartisan legislative achievements to her name in all of her time in the Senate.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Barf-O-Rama Rama Rama.
Are we all together sure that it is drool running out of her yap?/SS
Drooling. Hehehehe.
The entire Communist news media drooled over that sack of crap..nothing more than a user..who used Willie Brown and spit him out when he was no longer useful
AOL commies crapped themselves falling all over her.
I read that she hates him now because he traded her in for a younger version back in the day. it was actually an interview with Willie Brown where he alludes to the fact that she would arrest him if she could.
Sounds more like she was used.
Used? She knew what she was getting into, with a married man. That was her stepping stone into politics.
Just when you thought the MEDIA couldn’t get any more fawning over Democrats...
In 2016 it was 95% bad press against Trump and Republicans. 2020 will see it rise to 99%. But they will still lose.
Pravada on The Hudson
When the NY Slimes declares that Joseph Stalin is a moderate, why not Harris?
After all, Stalin was only the 2nd largest mass-murderer in history.
Mark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.