To: Harmless Teddy Bear
You might notice that it is raising an ethical and labor concern. In other words, very legally iffy.
Based on recent SCOTUS rulings I guess if an LGBTQ person refuses and you fire them it's gonna tie-up the entire Federal court system for the next thirteen years.
96 posted on
07/30/2020 2:12:29 PM PDT by
Buckeye McFrog
(Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
To: Buckeye McFrog
Probably.
But most states have made requiring employees to be non-smokers against the law. So it probably will never get to federal court.
I remember a few years ago Scotts tried this. They had to retreat after the state passed a new law saying "naughty, naughty, naughty".
109 posted on
07/30/2020 2:32:44 PM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(And lead us not into hysteria, but deliver us from the handwashers. Amen!)
To: Buckeye McFrog
Based on recent SCOTUS rulings I guess if an LGBTQ person refuses and you fire them it's gonna tie-up the entire Federal court system for the next thirteen years.LOL
I predict a sudden rush of folks claiming to be LGBTKSD
164 posted on
07/30/2020 8:23:25 PM PDT by
SisterK
(its a spiritual war)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson