Posted on 07/30/2020 10:13:42 AM PDT by conservative98
They’ll let any dumbass teach in government schools.
Sandra Bernhard has a gap in her front teeth that the builders of the Hoover Dam would be hard pressed to span.
“Her white supremacist hater a$$ needs to get laid! … by BLM members,” Soltesz’s post read.
Is she implying that the Mayor hates white supremascist hater? Because I sure interpreted what I read wrong, if that is the case.
They are both Ugly, inside and out.
So we can safely assume that the teacher engages in group activity off hours?
Then, NOT GUILTY!
> Nobody reads the articles don’t you know that? I don’t even know why they just don’t post the thread titles :-) <
I think these are good rules to follow:
- If you’ve been here less than a year: Carefully read the entire article before posting.
- If you’ve been here between one and five years: Quickly scan the excerpt, then post.
- If you’ve been here more than five years: Just glance at the title, then post. And then yell at anyone who says you misunderstood the article.
“the white supremacists who disrupted the Black Lives Matter protest”
Didn’t hear about this. Are we talking actual white supremacists, or just American flag-waving patriotic citizens?
... and if you’ve been here since ‘98 you can just post an incomprehensible vanity that may or may not refer to some other thread that you read, which may or may not have already been deleted.
> ... and if you’ve been here since ‘98 you can just post an incomprehensible vanity that may or may not refer to some other thread that you read, which may or may not have already been deleted. <
Excellent. I think I’ll add that to my list as a 15+ years rule. After all, the class of 1998 shouldn’t have all the fun.
I don’t understand the article. It said the mayor criticized white supremacists for disrupting a BLM rally. Why did the teacher then call the mayor a white supremacist when the mayor was criticizing white supremacists?
If you read the part where the Mayor attended a BLM rally and was disrupted by what the Mayor claimed to be “white supremacists” then it makes sense.
1) Mayor attends BLM rally and the rally is disruptedd/”assaulated”
2) Mayor later claims in an article criticizes “white supremacists” who she claims disrupted the rally
3) Article on a petition to recall Mayor goes up
4) Teacher replies about the Mayor’s white supremacist hating a— and how she needs to get laid by BLM.
She could have worded that ill-advised comment better or not made it at all, but she isn’t on the side of BLM like some of the earlier comments were saying.
Also, see this on the linked to article:
The comment was posted in response to an article on mediarightnews.com, which details how a petition is in the works to recall McLean after she criticized white supremacists who disrupted a recent Black Lives Matter Defund the Police rally in Boise.
https://www.idahostatesman.com/news/local/community/west-ada/article244374612.html
YIKES!!!
That’s a BIG Guilty vote from me with those bags of fat rolling off her sides and no muscle development.
Slang. Teacher said the Mayor had a white supremacist HATING a—. Mayor said they were WS (without evidence.) Petition to recall mayor goes up. Teacher replies to an article, take your WS hating a— on out and get ——— by BLM!
It’s a little confusing I guess.
I you think she’s guilty, you’re obviously just a young whipper-snapper.;-)
And I am sure she meant “get laid”.
Uh huh.
I wonder if she “axed” her BLM friends if it was smart to post that on FecesBook...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.