Posted on 06/30/2020 10:39:27 AM PDT by ransomnote
Gavin Newsom continues to kill Californians with Covid-19 to get mail-in-voting.
First he was one of 5 Dem governors to force Covid-19 patients in to nursing homes where they could infect and kill the most people. Hey, he had to get Covid-19 numbers up to lock down the state ASAP.
Apparently Newsom got a little self-conscious when asked to explain how he could go against well known medical advice to destroy the health of elderly Californians in rest homes. He pretended to be opening up the state on medical evidence, but if that were true he'd never have put those Covid-19 patients into rest homes.
Gavin Newsom would NEVER import Covid-19 patients from Mexico and fly them all over the state if he wanted CA to go back to work, open businesses and schools, and resume normal life. SO here's his second strategy, Newsom IS flying Covid-19 patients in from Mexico and sending them all over the state. Only when his lackeys in the MSM write it up, they make it sound like Covid-19 jumped the border without Newsom's help. Optics, you know!
The California Dream — the idea that every person can achieve a better life, regardless of where they start out — is central to who we are as Californians. Even in a time of economic growth and record employment, too many Californians are experiencing the squeeze of stagnant wages and the rising price of building-block necessities such as housing, health care, education, and child care. We can and must reanimate the California Dream, building a California for All. https://www.gov.ca.gov/
how exactly does he intend to ‘step up enforcement’ with defunded police departments distracted with rioters?
What does he care?
According to polls (believe them or not) -he has an over 90+% approval rating in the state. He’ll never be recalled. He’ll never be voted out.
Because: Demographics.
He’s driving out all productive tax-paying citizens and businesses that employ people and importing the 3rd world from Mexico as quickly as he can so they can vote Democrat in the presidential election.
Not that it matters, California is sadly solid blue.
To constitute depraved indifference, the defendant’s conduct must be ‘so wanton, so deficient in a moral sense of concern, so lacking in regard for the life or lives of others, and so blameworthy as to warrant the same criminal liability as that which the law imposes upon a person who intentionally causes a crime. Depraved indifference focuses on the risk created by the defendant’s conduct, not the injuries actually resulting.
In one case, People v Register, 60 NY2d 273, 469 NYS2d 599 (1983),while exploring the meaning of “depraved indifference recklessness” the Court of Appeals ruled that intoxication is not a defense or excuse to “depraved mind murder,” although it may be to intentional murder. Its analysis started with distinguishing reckless manslaughter from the “depraved indifference recklessness” necessary for murder:
“to bring defendant’s conduct within the murder statute, the People were required to establish also that defendant’s act was imminently dangerous and presented a very high risk of death to others and that it was committed under circumstances which evidenced a wanton indifference to human life or a depravity of mind. . . . . The crime differs from intentional murder in that it results not from a specific, conscious intent to cause death, but from an indifference to or disregard of the risks attending defendant’s conduct.” 60 NY2d at 274.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.