Watch that potty mouf, young lady.
“I think you and others have clearly made your points. “
Puppy spanking duly noted!
*******************************************************************************************
Well PALE Blue! I don’t usually get involved with language policing.
However, I’m always grateful for those who do speak up. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. We have some trouble in this country for lack of objection to things the majority do not agree with.
I seriously thought this was OVER at Post #770 and #890 with apologies accepted, and invitation for further discussion was declined to stop further thread slide.
But noooooo-people who were not even a party to the conversation during night shift wanted to weigh in. Well OK-Free Speech-Right to speak your opinion-as Blu has often said. Since I was pinged, I’ll respond:
Well, it all started after post #594 to me which contained a profanity that was mildly disturbing. I ignored the word in my response to the subject of CV.
Post #609 using the profanity again and describing a scene which painted a graphic picture that was cringe - worthy. That’s strike 2 but I ignored it.
Post 731 smart aleck reply to Petey’s objection—Foul Ball.
Post 744 disparagement of Petey to another person without even tagging Petey. That’s an OUT.
I arrive at the thread today, and there’s a DOGPILE on Petey, and then complaints about further discussion. Well good grief why bring it up after the people involved had already hashed it out?
And why SCOLD Petey, when we all know that she’s polite, and not inclined to be the language police?
Petey did absolutely NOTHING wrong. Now if any of you want complain about this post-I’d be happy to discuss it privately. Alternatively, feel free to SCROLL on by and give your fingers some extra exercise.
However, if you respond to me publicly on this thread, I will respond publicly on the thread.
Gee whiz.
Not sure what to make of this ^^^^
Watch that potty mouf, young lady.
Petey’s a good egg!