Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Flynn & the U.S. v. Sullivan is going to be streamed from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals tomorrow (Friday) at 9:30 AM EST.
youtube | 6/11/2020

Posted on 06/11/2020 7:20:25 PM PDT by bitt

Flynn & the U.S. v. Sullivan (AKA In Re: Michael T. Flynn) is going to be streamed from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals tomorrow (Friday) at 9:30 AM EST.

The court is expecting a lot of interest in the case, so they’re directing people to their YouTube channel, which is here:


TOPICS: Conspiracy; History; Military/Veterans; Society; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: flynn; henderson; rao; sullivan; wall; wilkins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 next last
To: PghBaldy

Yes truly disgusting.

All of you who predicted a Sullivan slapdown were wrong.


101 posted on 06/12/2020 8:05:49 AM PDT by gcparent (Justice Brett Kavanaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

He is itching to hand this back to Sullivan 2 black liberal judges able to destroy white man


102 posted on 06/12/2020 8:06:57 AM PDT by Hambone 1934
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner

Well, anybody care to guess which way the Majority will rule based on what we’ve heard?


103 posted on 06/12/2020 8:13:33 AM PDT by The Westerner (Protect the most vulnerable: get the government out of medicine, education and forests!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Hambone 1934

Court adjourned until wed 9 Dec ?


104 posted on 06/12/2020 8:14:00 AM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner

Sorry, didn’t know there was a discussion ongoing! It was difficult to follow the arguments, particularly the Respondents.


105 posted on 06/12/2020 8:15:03 AM PDT by The Westerner (Protect the most vulnerable: get the government out of medicine, education and forests!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

Shakespeare was right!

TXnMA    
  

106 posted on 06/12/2020 8:18:00 AM PDT by TXnMA (Anagram: "PANDEMIC --> DEM PANIC")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner

Beth was awful. Not that it means anything. Wilkins was obvious kept pulling white cop and black victim out of his hat.

Is that grounds for appeal?


107 posted on 06/12/2020 8:18:36 AM PDT by gcparent (Justice Brett Kavanaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: gcparent

Reo is on our side, Wilkins is a far left political judge, he’ll always throw the law out for politics. Henderson, a Reagan appointee and Bush appointee will be the swing vote, and didn’t sound particularly supportive.


108 posted on 06/12/2020 8:47:06 AM PDT by Fido969 (In!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

When will decision be announced?


109 posted on 06/12/2020 8:48:18 AM PDT by gcparent (Justice Brett Kavanaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Fido969; gcparent; Cboldt

I wrote this on another thread, but would like cboldt’s take:

From listening to the Judges’ comments, I’d say they will send the case back to Judge Sullivan so he can hold his “hearing”, which then allows him to either dismiss or not. Appeal Court Judges said, “if he does not dismiss at that point, come back and see us then. But Mandamus is not warranted.” At least, that’s my takeaway. I’m not an attorney but was raised by a damn good one!


110 posted on 06/12/2020 9:11:28 AM PDT by The Westerner (Protect the most vulnerable: get the government out of medicine, education and forests!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner

I wrote this on another thread, but would like cboldt’s take:

From listening to the Judges’ comments, I’d say they will send the case back to Judge Sullivan so he can hold his “hearing”, which then allows him to either dismiss or not. Appeal Court Judges said, “if he does not dismiss at that point, come back and see us then. But Mandamus is not warranted.” At least, that’s my takeaway. I’m not an attorney but was raised by a damn good one!
***************************************************
That was my takeaway also...but you never know for sure solely from oral arguments/questions. I’m also not an attorney. Tried to stay in a Holiday Inn Express recently but it was closed due to the Coronavirus.


111 posted on 06/12/2020 9:38:14 AM PDT by House Atreides (It is not a HOAX but it IS CERTAINLY A PRETEXT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner

Flynn must be exonerated in a Court of law so that he can participate in government again, protect himself with firearms again, and maybe go after the Obama Coupsters in a Civil case.


Good summary and why I think this kabuki theater will continue as long as “ protectionism” of those who perpetrated this sham can be protected.

Who knows maybe they are waiting to see if Barr/Durham “ prosecute” anyone close to the origins of this..

Wouldn’t surprise me that , this is also in play for this obvious theater..


112 posted on 06/12/2020 9:47:28 AM PDT by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
-- From listening to the Judges' comments, I'd say they will send the case back to Judge Sullivan so he can hold his "hearing", which then allows him to either dismiss or not. Appeal Court Judges said, "if he does not dismiss at that point, come back and see us then. But Mandamus is not warranted." --

I agree that is most likely. Toss it back to Sullivan, who, in the DC Circuit's point of view hasn't yet misbehaved.

If the public had a clue what hacks these judges are, there would be a stronger outcry that we get now. We're pretty much a banana republic, and the judges are a big part of that.

113 posted on 06/12/2020 10:01:24 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: gcparent
-- When will decision be announced? --

There is no ddeadline. Pretty much up to the judges. They could wait and see what Sullivan does then issue a "case is moot" ruling six weeks from now.

114 posted on 06/12/2020 10:03:23 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
I know the questions don't always reflect the way the Court will decide. But their respectful attitude toward Sullivan is at odds with their swift granting of this hearing. What bothered me the most, as I ponder what I heard, is that only Sidney Powell spoke of the egregious government misconduct.

I've been deeply bothered that the DOJ chose to withdraw the case on the grounds that there was no investigation, not on the grounds that the case was manufactured to destroy Flynn and hopefully to get some dirt on Trump. It gives Judge Sullivan wiggle room to ignore the Brady violations, the new material and the fact that Flynn was both coerced into pleading guilty and was lied to by his own attorneys who out of self-interest convinced him to tell his only lie: that he told a lie to the FBI.

The case is a Byzantine mess whose purpose is to confuse folks who get lost in the complexity of lies. Even I was upset at Flynn when he admitted guilt and had appeared on Russia TV as a commentator. His book “Field of Fight” contradicts the concocted narrative that he is not the Boy Scout which I believe he is. Since then I read most of the Court briefs, and the evidence, and puzzled over the Stroke/Page texts with everyone else. My conclusion: America needs to sit down and study the Constitution and choose whether we want to have a triparte system or not!

115 posted on 06/12/2020 10:05:23 AM PDT by The Westerner (Protect the most vulnerable: get the government out of medicine, education and forests!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

They could wait and see what Sullivan does then issue a “case is moot” ruling six weeks from now.


Wait and see what Sullivan does? Does that mean Sullivan can convene a jury to hear his version of the case, and require Flynn to appear ?

thanks for your response


116 posted on 06/12/2020 10:06:57 AM PDT by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: patriotspride
-- Wait and see what Sullivan does? Does that mean Sullivan can convene a jury to hear his version of the case, and require Flynn to appear ? --

No, it doesn't mean that. It means wait until after the July District court hearing and subsequent ruling (which has no deadline either).

The courts don't care about Flynn, he's not incarcerated so as far as the courts are concerned, no harm is occuring, period. Trial judges are getting a new power!

Everybody wants to rule the world, especially judges.

If Sullivan enters an order as nutty as the one you suggest (which I admit would not be nutty for Sullivan), Flynn can file another petitition for mandamus, this one around whatever orders create the trial.

117 posted on 06/12/2020 10:16:53 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

See my post #115.

“...If the public had a clue what hacks these judges are, there would be a stronger outcry that we get now. We’re pretty much a banana republic, and the judges are a big part of that...”

You know, I am part of the public, millions of us, who support General Flynn. I know how depraved the swamp is, knew it before Trump did in his first months of office—before Flynn who didn’t know that the terrorists he negotiated with in Afghanistan were more honorable than Pete Stroke and Andy McCabe.

Since following this case, their method has become crystal clear, e.g., Judge out of the blue in Flynn Appeal talks about DOJ abuse by white police of a black victim. ValJar and Lawfare send out the script, it gets repeated by all the Coupsters, becomes the international headline du jour, and only President Trump in his Twitter feed punches back loud enough to be “heard”.

Can this Republic be saved? As long as we have Generals like Trump and Flynn it’s worth the fight!


118 posted on 06/12/2020 10:24:07 AM PDT by The Westerner (Protect the most vulnerable: get the government out of medicine, education and forests!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner

Thanks for the reply and pointer. Couple of great posts!

I’m independent by nature, I think that spirit is best for society as a whole, and I’m well up for the fight.

The government is out of control, it and the press are actively misleading and manipulating the public. This sort of situation never lasts, says history. Something is going to break.


119 posted on 06/12/2020 11:05:06 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner

So they are saying: Let the torture and abuse of Flynn continue.”


120 posted on 06/12/2020 11:19:26 AM PDT by Fido969 (In!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson