prosecutor shopping
Sounds like the Zimmerman case, keep switching prosecutors until you find one willing to prosecute.
Kori Muhammad killed three white men in Los Angeles because they were white. He stated that in court. But yet no one can name a single one of his victims. Because the media suppressed that story.
White lives matter too
The new prosecutor, Joyette M. Holmes, is a Republican
“Holmes, who was elected to a four-year term as chief magistrate in 2016 on the Republican ticket, will succeed interim District Attorney John Melvin. Melvin was appointed interim after Kemp chose then-District Attorney Vic Reynolds to serve as director of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation in February.”
What don’t we know that’s dissuading prosecutors?
Unless the initial prosecutor lied in his written and signed explanation of why he didn’t prosecute, there is little chance these guys will be convicted. And DA Barnhill wrote the letter with full knowledge the case was to be reviewed by a 2nd DA. I suspect the new prosecutors, after reviewing the actual evidence and statements, are reaching the same conclusions.
No prosecutor wants to take a case they think they will lose, particularly one with high media interest that will follow them the rest of their career. But now people are afraid to dismiss because of the Trayvon Martin type media narrative about two white guys hunting and killing a black jogger for sport.
I want to know about every jaywalking incident,evidence of drug or alcohol use,criminal convictions (juvenile and adult)...EVERYTHING.
The video I've seen doesn't come within light years of being "revealing" enough to form an opinion regarding criminal culpability.
I wouldn’t touch that at all. I also wouldn’t want to be on the jury. The left got a race issue just in time for the election. Maybe St. Jogger didn’t deserve to die but here we have another loser of society running around up to no good like the other Saints Skittles,Blunt and Loosie. In the old days,the Pop would whip the ass of the boy running around like that.
Could this simply be another violation of the “Safari Rule”?
As was learned in the Travon Martin case, it is a violation of the “Safari Rule” to make eye contact with blacks you believe are acting suspicious or especially by exiting your vehicle. Those actions will not be tolerated by a black, as you are deemed to be “dissing” them. You must understand that blacks are simply unable to control their response to being dissed. Remember, if you commit either of those two provocative actions, whatever happens next will be your fault.
To put it bluntly, if you commit either of those two actions you are putting your life in danger and it will be YOUR FAULT if you die, regardless of any other facts (ie other facts will have no bearing upon your obvious guilt). And, if the black dies you will be guilty of murder.
If you have any doubt about the validity of this rule, just ask Benjamin Crump...the most honest lawyer in the Universe.
They’ve all but been convicted now. No Justice, No Peace!
No News Tonight now floating hate crime stuff, nothing on case history backgrounds.