Posted on 05/08/2020 10:27:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Standard treatment = Anything but HCQ
Looks like a good article /in before the Plandemikers...
So let me re-state the three essentials: : PREVENTION, PREVENTION, PREVENTION.
Based on this, we recommend that clinicians provide evidence-based ARDS treatments to patients with respiratory failure due to COVID-19 and await standardized clinical trials before contemplating novel therapies, said colead author Jehan Alladina, MD, an Instructor in Medicine at Mass General.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In other words do not employ Hydroxy Chloroquine, Azithromycin along with Zinc vitamin, a treatment that the American Board of Surgeons have indicated is 97% successful.
Jehan Alladina is a public health asshole. Period.What he is saying is inhumane.
This is no time now for the unethical organization of clinical trials which give infected patients placebos instead of the successful therapy.
Doctors who violate there Hippocratic oath are not doctors.
According to the CDC 1.3 million people worldwide have recovered from Covid-19, almost 200,000 of those in the U.S. alone. How many received HCQ and how many did not?
RE: So let me re-state the three essentials: : PREVENTION, PREVENTION, PREVENTION.
And where can we find Doctors who are willing to prescribe these off label and outside of a hospital setting with the FDA and the CDC discouraging it, and the media attacking it as ineffective no end?
RE: According to the CDC 1.3 million people worldwide have recovered from Covid-19
And how many have been infected and how many cases are still active?
RE: According to the CDC 1.3 million people worldwide have recovered from Covid-19
Also, how many are infected BUT asymptomatic? I know of two in their forties here in NY who are asymptomatic but infected their mothers.
Study finds that most people (5 out of 6) who play Russian Roulette survive.
My question to the doc who says we should try older methods first- why can’t BOTH be tried at the same time? Unless it would interfere with the older methods? If it wouldn’t- then throw the kitchen sink at the problem- use whatever weapons we have for best possible outcomes- you go to war with the weapons you have- not with weapons that are promised or are way out on the horizon
[[How many received HCQ and how many did not?]]
That’s a very important question and IF Fox News were a real news station- they would investigate this question and be giving the results on the news nightly-
But they have likely been told to shut up about HCQ success-
liability issues:
ReveilleIn reply to OldArmy71 10:06a, 5/3/20AG
OldArmy71 said:
Dr. Coates, something I have wanted to ask since the newest FDA directive came out about the hydroxy.
Can physicians still prescribe it to people in their private practice, people not in the hospital or enrolled in a study?
Thank you for all you are doing for your patients and for us!
I met with a group of doctors last Friday night in a zoom call. We all decided that we are getting good results and will continue. So I had a medical lawyer draw me up a consent to use.
Absent far more extensive testing than we're doing now we will never know the answer to that.
I mean, they can do both. I have no doubt we have better treatment than China and some european countries.
But it is also helpful to get people out of hospitals quicker, and so if a medication can do that, or if it can prevent people from getting to the point where they need a ventilator, why not?
I am beginning to think that HCQ is not particularly effective when given to people already in critical care. But that a lot of these people get better with treatment, so giving then HCQ, and then focusing on their treatment, makes it look like HCQ might be helping, when it is just the extra care and treatment they are getting, that China didn’t give and other countries didn’t give.
And that doesn’t bother me at all. I don’t own stock in HCQ, Trump never said “HCQ is my cure”, so it is not an attack on Trump if it turns out HCQ is less helpful than it looked.
What is sad is how many people seem happy when we find a treatment isn’t as good as we hoped, and seem to hate when people try to find hope at all.
I’ve been listening the last few days and haven’t heard them mentioning it anymore- But I’m not listening to the night shows- so perhaps they are- But all I’m hearing on fox now is how wonderful Remsidiver is- and how much promise it is showing despite only hastening the recovery 33% faster compared to HCQ which hastens recovery 66% fast
And of course now they are on the flynn thing, and Tara reed thing- so maybe that has to do with lack of HCQ during day mentions-
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.