To: Mrs. Don-o
RE: So let me re-state the three essentials: : PREVENTION, PREVENTION, PREVENTION.
And where can we find Doctors who are willing to prescribe these off label and outside of a hospital setting with the FDA and the CDC discouraging it, and the media attacking it as ineffective no end?
7 posted on
05/08/2020 10:46:23 AM PDT by
SeekAndFind
(look at Michigan, it will)
To: SeekAndFind
Doctors should be smart and pro-active on behalf of their patients. True, they've been lied to right and left. But Dr. Zelenko tweets out every day links to international research, clinical trials, case histories and all manner of empirical evidence of the effectiveness of his HCQ protocol--- if done on an outpatient basis a.s.a.p. after the first symptoms of infection emerge. Effective even for elderly people with comorbidities.
https://twitter.com/zev_dr
13 posted on
05/08/2020 10:52:52 AM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
(Tell the truth about goodness, tell the truth about evil, and don't side with the Enemy.)
To: SeekAndFind
liability issues:
ReveilleIn reply to OldArmy71 10:06a, 5/3/20AG
OldArmy71 said:
Dr. Coates, something I have wanted to ask since the newest FDA directive came out about the hydroxy.
Can physicians still prescribe it to people in their private practice, people not in the hospital or enrolled in a study?
Thank you for all you are doing for your patients and for us!
Yes it just increases the liability if you do so it will likely give a lot if doctors reservation or some refuse to do so. I hope not.
I met with a group of doctors last Friday night in a zoom call. We all decided that we are getting good results and will continue. So I had a medical lawyer draw me up a consent to use.
14 posted on
05/08/2020 10:52:59 AM PDT by
RummyChick
( Yeah, it's Daily Mail. So what.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson