From what Ive heard, he was in full retreat when shot. Whether he was just jogging or running away, this cannot be defined as a good shoot.
***************************************************
From what you HEARD? Have you not seen the video? He clearly charged the son and was struggling to take the shotgun from the son for who knows what purpose This is by no means a clear cut case.
Yes it is the father and son had no right to confront him. They hadnt seen him commit a crime nor had he attacked them. These two needyogo g
Down for murder.
The guy was in the road and those two men confronted HIM! how you can take up for those two is mind boggling
I saw the video on yesterday’s evening news. The video showed the polar opposite of what the talking head described. The “jogger” charged at a man pointing a gun at him and tried to wrestle the gun away.
The story presented was that the two men, father and son, were trying to make a citizens arrest of the man who they claimed was responsible for a string of robberies, one of which they had just witnessed and were chasing the suspect. The 2 men might have been 100% wrong about the “victim”, and he may have been innocent. But he charged an armed man and tried to take his gun away. There is no way a jury is going to convict for murder with clear video showing the struggle.
and was struggling to take the shotgun from the son for who knows what purpose
= = =
from the son who took a shotgun in his truck and chased him down
I call that self defense on the Victim’s part.
Yes, after they shot at him. Are you effin’ blind?
I saw that video, several questions, who shot it and where has it been for the last two months. Also has it been edited?
I find this tape suspicious.
Cases are never clear cut.
But, looks to be clear cut act of defense by the deceased.
Three armed men in trucks block him off, get out of the vehicle, point guns at him and their fingers are on. the trigger.
It was fight or flight time.
The two men are going to jail !