Posted on 04/29/2020 6:47:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
An I’m-so-cute-and-clever reporter recently asked the president if he deserved to be re-elected given the number of deaths from coronavirus, noting that the number is greater than American fatalities from the Vietnam war.
People can always find something as a point of comparison as if that automatically adds weight to what they are implying. No doubt this reporter thought stats from the Vietnam war added gravitas to her query.
In any case, her disrespectful and rude question didn’t deserve to be dignified with an answer. But Trump answered her anyway. Unfortunately, he didn’t use the opportunity to his advantage by giving her a little history lesson, as discussed at The Daily Wire:
…She may have been unaware that at the height of the Vietnam war, there was something that killed more Americans than the war did, and it was a similar virus — and no one questioned whether a president should be elected or not because of the virus, known as the Hong Kong Flu.
In 1968-69, the Hong Kong flu ravaged the world; it wound up killing more than one million people worldwide, over 100,000 of them in the United States. No lockdowns were imposed and people still went to work, albeit lessening bus travel and implementing social distancing and more washing of their hands.
The Wall Street Journal explained. “The novel virus triggered a state of emergency in New York City; caused so many deaths in Berlin that corpses were stored in subway tunnels; overwhelmed London’s hospitals; and in some areas of France left half of the workforce bedridden.”
As John Fund notes in National Review, the Hong Kong Flu “was an especially infectious virus that had the ability to mutate and render existing vaccines ineffective … Hundreds of thousands were hospitalized in the U.S.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I have been using this example since the beginning, the HK flu was deadly and infected over 70% of the then population and there is debate as to how many in the U.S. died , I have seen a figure as high as 215,000 deaths and 2 to 3 million worldwide. Yet no panic and no shutdown, although if we had social media then the hysteria and panic would have been as today.
And yet we essentially went about our lives normally. Maybe we were a little bit more careful for a while, but otherwise nothing much changed.
RE: Was too young to remember at the time. Was that with our without lockdown measures?
See Post #27 above.
in 1968, US population was 200 million.
RE:in 1968, US population was 200 million
100,000 deaths in a country of 200 million is DEVASTATING to say the least.
The difference — there was no internet, social media, instant messaging, cable news, etc. to scare the masses.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.