[LibWhacker]

It's weird. Just as I feared.

[ronnie raygun]

Says a lot about us being in a sweet spot and maybe not by accident but on purpose

[Erik Latranyi]

Things are far more complex than science believes.

Science tries to reduce things to simplicity, but that is not reality.

When the human genome was mapped, they were astonished to find an insufficient number of combinations to account for human variability.

This is why climate science basing everything on CO2 is a failure. It is far more complex a system than how the frauds make it out to be.

[Drango]

weak nuclear force

The weak needs to step up its game. Try CrossFit or HIIT.

[Savage Beast]

If there is a directionality to the universe, does this explain, or correlate with, why time flows, or appears to flow, in one direction only?

[RonnG]

“The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars / But in ourselves”

[TalBlack]

People who don’t know jack shit about Nature really don’t get to call anything “weird”.

[misanthrope]

Cosmos electric

[CARTOUCHE]

Just when we think we have it all figgered out the aliens thrown a wrench into it. Next we’ll find that Pi really isn’t.

[wastoute]

So the Universe isn’t so much a Big Bang but more of a Western Union Telegram? Kurt Vonnegut was right?

[Moonman62]

In a paper published in Science Advances, scientists from UNSW Sydney reported that four new measurements of light emitted from a quasar 13 billion light years away reaffirm past studies that found tiny variations in the fine structure constant.

...

Tiny deviations and unverified, but that won’t stop the kooks from claiming that their crazy idea is right.

[Moonman62]

If there is a directionality in the universe, Professor Webb argues, and if electromagnetism is shown to be very slightly different in certain regions of the cosmos, the most fundamental concepts underpinning much of modern physics will need revision.

“Our standard model of cosmology is based on an isotropic universe, one that is the same, statistically, in all directions,” he says.

...

The big deal is directionality.

[Moonman62]

But adding to the side of the argument that says these findings are more than just coincidence, a team in the US working completely independently and unknown to Professor Webb’s, made observations about X-rays that seemed to align with the idea that the universe has some sort of directionality.

“I didn’t know anything about this paper until it appeared in the literature,” he says.

“And they’re not testing the laws of physics, they’re testing the properties, the X-ray properties of galaxies and clusters of galaxies and cosmological distances from Earth. They also found that the properties of the universe in this sense are not isotropic and there’s a preferred direction. And lo and behold, their direction coincides with ours.”

...

I wonder if the observations in the article coincide with the Axis of Evil.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_of_evil_(cosmology)

[I want the USA back]

When scientists call something weird it means that their theories are inadequate, but that they cling fast to their theories and cannot accept any other explanation.

The Universe works, and it’s foolish to think that any human can understand it fully.

[PeterPrinciple]

The study of systems, and then systems within systems lead to one answer and gives a headache.

So the only thing we can do is ignore the systems, build a model based on 3 or 4 factors and consider ourselves god.

[Uncle Miltie]

It’s all relative.

[Mrs. Don-o]

I always told my husband this would happen.

:o)

Right?

[Swordmaker]

The Universe, especially in the Electromagnetic portion of it, is weirder than cosmologists ever thought. Now they are finding it has a DIRECTIONALITY TO IT! Do you suppose it may be cause in our local area it is because there is an unexpected flow of current they’ve never before measured? The other question must also be asked. Are quasars actually where we think they are? There are quasars which are in axial alignment of nearby galaxies which have much lower redshirts than the quasars, and often the galaxies are behind the quasar with a far higher redshift. This caused Astronomer Harlton Arp to question the entire paradigm of redshift being correlated to distance. . . or alternately, that quasars are even what Gravity Universe Cosmologists think they are: rapidly spinning blackholes with ejecta jets. Since then, the observation of a few Quasars that have inexplicably change periodicity has thrown that theory into a charged spin, challenging the laws of physics and the conservation of energy.

Gravity cosmologists can blithely toss off lines such as “This pulsar was created inside of a supernova and is speeding away from it with a 37 light year long tail of dust and gas.”, without bothering to explain a gravity mechanism that accounts for how such a plume of “gas and dust” stays cohesive over such a distance. Electric Universe cosmologists can easily explain it, and fine structures within the “Herbig Haro” structure, which can be found everywhere within the Universe are ubiquitous, because they are not mere “gas and dust, but charged electromagnetic plasmas, powered by electric currents flowing through the Universe. —Electric/Plasma Universe PING!

Clear Example of a Birkeland Current
"Z" Pinch with Symmetrical Plasmids
seen in Hubble Telescope View of
The Twin Jet Nebula
ELECTRIC/PLASMA UNIVERSE PING!

If you want on or off the Electric Universe/Plasma Ping List, Freepmail me.

[minnesota_bound]

This explains.

Penny Explains Leonard’s Experiment
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gA-ZzVgmRc