Wasn’t the Chapel Hill research in 2016, for Mers, and not Sars ??
That was a whole 4 second search. But facts never stopped conspiracies meant to portray the US as culpable - too many are more than willing to pile on.
But hey, let’s go whole hog, what the hell - we can implicate Oxford and Cambridge, too, and India, and Australia, France, Germany, Israel, Russia, and every other country that is not China as long as it advances Panda Propaganda that America is the origin of all sin, eh?
Less than 4 second search
https://www.statnews.com/2015/11/09/sars-like-virus-bats-shows-potential-infect-humans-study-finds/
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/11/151110115711.htm
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26552008
I am really really interested as to why you pretend that the Chapel Hill experiment didnt involve exactly the type of thing that this turned into...SARS with Horseshoe Bat.
Why pretend that article after scientific article after scientific article on this experiment done with the Wuhan Bat Lady and Chapel Hill doesn’t use the word SARS
and btw, I know this is not the first time you have tried to claim that Chapel Hill and Wuhan had no connection
It’s quite curious when now we know it IS the same lady just using a different version of her name.
I have never implied that this outbreak came from Chapel Hill..but you always seem to slide that denial in there
It’s very weird
Do you work for Chapel Hill?
There is something very very weird about how you respond to the CHapel Hill Study. You go out of your way to pretend it didn’t involve a Sars-like study. Even to the point on another thread claiming it was a MERS study and not SARS
How many times does SARS have to be mentioned in the scientific articles before you will admit it???
https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/113/11/3048.full.pdf?sid=05ebeac0-e981-4741-b9c5-76e53457d29f