Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New study casts doubt on hyrdoxychloroquine’s effectiveness in treating coronavirus vs. standard existing best practice for conventional care
Tech Crunch ^ | 03/25/2020 | Darrel Etherington

Posted on 03/25/2020 6:42:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-155 next last

1 posted on 03/25/2020 6:42:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’ll wait to see what our researchers say before passing judgment...


2 posted on 03/25/2020 6:45:31 AM PDT by sam_whiskey (Peace through Strength.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well, if Tech Crunch says it it must be so.


3 posted on 03/25/2020 6:45:40 AM PDT by Artemis Webb (There are only two genders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“The study has been criticized by some for its methods – which is the entire purpose of scientific study and medical research, wherein people submit their studies for peer review prior to publication, and then other researchers challenge their assumptions, results and findings.”

Right. Keep up with the bureaucratic ways, and in six or seven years we might formally decide the treatment is safe.

Trump, OTOH, says go with it now, it MIGHT work, and save your life.

I’ll go with Trump.


4 posted on 03/25/2020 6:45:43 AM PDT by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Let me fix that last line:

Trump Darrel is obviously not a scientist or medical professional, and yet he has been touting written an article doubting the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine.

5 posted on 03/25/2020 6:45:52 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (The prisons do not fill themselves. Get moving, Barr!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
... a new small-scale study by researchers in China...

I guess that settles it.

/s

6 posted on 03/25/2020 6:46:04 AM PDT by pax_et_bonum (God is good, He loves us, and He is always with us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We shall see


7 posted on 03/25/2020 6:46:10 AM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ("Washington, DC. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Garbage test. There is no control group with no treatment.

All this test may prove is that the other methods are almost as good as the test medicine.


8 posted on 03/25/2020 6:47:17 AM PDT by Bartholomew Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

the OHCQ group has radiologic progression in a third
vs. almost half of the “control” group.

the OHCQ was probably sicker at the start,
and Zpack was not even given.

We Trust Pres. Trump far more than the Red Chinese.


9 posted on 03/25/2020 6:47:49 AM PDT by Diogenesis ( WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

But he touted a drug combo. The study is false.

I have never hated our media more than now. And I thought that wasn’t possible.

They are rooting for this virus because Trump is battling it.

Open by Easter? Not ever!!! The media will argue the dangers of this virus for six more months. Luckily, we are reaching a breaking point where the people of this country are getting rapidly tired of being controlled.


10 posted on 03/25/2020 6:48:16 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Tech Crunch made this conclusion by citing a small case Chinese study.

Yet, we have another Chinese study that showed a DIFFERENT RESULT.

See here:

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/bst/14/1/14_2020.01047/_pdf/-char/en

Breakthrough: Chloroquine phosphate has shown apparent
efficacy in treatment of COVID-19 associated pneumonia in
clinical studies

Which one to believe?


11 posted on 03/25/2020 6:49:29 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (look at Michigan, it will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It needs zinc to work.
So they are going to continue to report “mixed” results and failure.


12 posted on 03/25/2020 6:50:41 AM PDT by BDParrish ( Please correct me! I never learned anything from anybody who already agreed with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

And if it’s no better doesn’t that mean it’s just as good?


13 posted on 03/25/2020 6:51:20 AM PDT by Quality_Not_Quantity (A law means nothing if it isnÂ’t followed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Back in the 70’s, a friend of my wife’s parents had invented an amazing burn medication. He was getting amazing results in testing. However, it was formally tested by some government agency and they determined it was ineffective.

Howver, part of the instructions for using it was that it was imperative that the bandages be loose to allow oxygen into the area, but they wrapped the banages tightly.

Meanwhile, we had a couple of sample bottles and had to use it a few times. It was amazing.

Of course, that’s just anecdotal. :)


14 posted on 03/25/2020 6:51:24 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The ole Chinese study, eh??

Well, they’ve been so forthcoming and helpful throughout all of this I can see why we should put our trust...

OK, I can’t go on.

/sarc


15 posted on 03/25/2020 6:51:29 AM PDT by Shoefus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

And here’s another China study (this one cited by the CDC website):

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/therapeutic-options.html

(EXCERPT)

A study in China reported that chloroquine treatment of COVID-19 patients had clinical and virologic benefit versus a comparison group, and chloroquine was added as a recommended antiviral for treatment of COVID-19 in China

So, a Chinese study vs another Chinese study... which Chinese study to believe?


16 posted on 03/25/2020 6:52:30 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (look at Michigan, it will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A study from China? Lol!


17 posted on 03/25/2020 6:52:30 AM PDT by Captain Compassion (I'm just sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

This article would never have been written if a Dem was president (shudder the thought). The media only writes what advances the Left’s agenda.


18 posted on 03/25/2020 6:52:42 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Trial underway in NYC, which began yesterday. We should have some idea as to the drug’s effectiveness in a few days. India has put a ban on the export of the drug. They must believe it has some promise. Germany and France are using it on patients.


19 posted on 03/25/2020 6:52:44 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_whiskey

Agreed. I wouldn’t put it past the CCP to put out a false study just to cause even more damage.


20 posted on 03/25/2020 6:53:05 AM PDT by FreedomForce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-155 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson