Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

“The study has been criticized by some for its methods – which is the entire purpose of scientific study and medical research, wherein people submit their studies for peer review prior to publication, and then other researchers challenge their assumptions, results and findings.”

Right. Keep up with the bureaucratic ways, and in six or seven years we might formally decide the treatment is safe.

Trump, OTOH, says go with it now, it MIGHT work, and save your life.

I’ll go with Trump.


4 posted on 03/25/2020 6:45:43 AM PDT by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CondorFlight

The medical profession knows how to use this treatment safely. The question is where or not it is effective, or better, “how effective.” According to this article, it is as effective as the 100 times more expensive drugs.


134 posted on 03/25/2020 8:48:50 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: CondorFlight

The Chinese small study was also not peer reviewed and blessed by the medical intelligentsia.

Also see my previous post above.


147 posted on 03/25/2020 10:37:28 AM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you care!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson