Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Toyota plans to develop fuel cell truck with Hino unit
OAN News ^ | March 23, 2020 | Reporting by Naomi Tajitsu; Editing by Clarence Fernandez

Posted on 03/23/2020 6:48:58 AM PDT by Red Badger

TOKYO (Reuters) – Japan’s Toyota Motor Corp on Monday said it would develop a heavy-duty fuel-cell truck with its subsidiary, Hino Motor Co, as it sees hydrogen technology as a zero-emissions alternative to battery power for large commercial vehicles.

In a statement, Toyota said the truck, based on Hino’s Profia model, would be equipped with two fuel cell stacks developed for the next model of its Mirai fuel cell sedan. It would have a traveling range of 600 kilometers (373 miles).

Toyota has long touted fuel cell vehicles as the ultimate “green car”, and sees the technology as more efficient than battery electric cars, embraced by many rivals as a zero-emissions alternative to gasoline vehicles.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Outdoors; Society; Travel
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 03/23/2020 6:48:58 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
I remember a GM fuel cell rig from the 60s.


2 posted on 03/23/2020 6:54:47 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

If this technology really works it would be game changer and crush electric cars as competition....


3 posted on 03/23/2020 6:56:58 AM PDT by srmanuel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: srmanuel

It’s a proven technology, just expensive and not widely available in all countries for refills.................


4 posted on 03/23/2020 6:58:36 AM PDT by Red Badger (If people were to God like dogs are to people, the world would be a really great place..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Toyota has long touted fuel cell vehicles as the ultimate “green car”, and sees the technology as more efficient than battery electric cars, embraced by many rivals as a zero-emissions alternative to gasoline vehicles.

...

Yep. They’ve been saying that for many years, yet I don’t see much for sale in that category.


5 posted on 03/23/2020 7:00:21 AM PDT by Moonman62 (http://www.freerepublic.com/~moonman62/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I think it will work in Japan because its relatively small size makes it viable to have hydrogen refueling stations built at economically practical cost.


6 posted on 03/23/2020 7:05:34 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's Economic Cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

And if it’s truly economical, outfits like UPS, FedEx, and local transit who fuel at their hubs will adopt it.


7 posted on 03/23/2020 7:07:08 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

True, but a lot things start out expensive until they prove they work and get commercially acceptable...

For a number of reasons I’ve never been completely sold on battery powered cars....

If the Environmental nuts were true to the cause they would be against lithium batteries especially when they see how it’s mined...in 5-10 years or at some point in time these batteries will reach end of life, how will they be disposed of or can they be recycled...


8 posted on 03/23/2020 7:07:26 AM PDT by srmanuel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

It will crush the petrol and electric car industry. Must be phased in, to avoid devastating plant closures and job losses, all at once.
Hydrogen will replace them all, in time.


9 posted on 03/23/2020 7:07:35 AM PDT by Fireone (Build the gallows first, then the wall!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Toyota has long touted fuel cell vehicles as the ultimate “green car”, and sees the technology as more efficient than battery electric cars, embraced by many rivals as a zero-emissions alternative to gasoline vehicles.

...

I don’t see how it’s more efficient when energy is required to make hydrogen and then it needs to be transported to a filling station.

Electricity is much easier to transport and a filing station can be placed in a driver’s home or anywhere else that electricity is available.


10 posted on 03/23/2020 7:10:04 AM PDT by Moonman62 (http://www.freerepublic.com/~moonman62/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: srmanuel

Hydrogen is the direction for long haul and vehicles outside city limits/rural areas. Hydrogen was tested in California but again it was too little and the infrastructure costs will be more but I like H-power better than the e-cars especially to retrofit petroleum engines to h-power.


11 posted on 03/23/2020 7:14:35 AM PDT by Liaison (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Wait, then we could use water for fuel. The greenies will not like that...


12 posted on 03/23/2020 7:20:30 AM PDT by eartick (Stupidity is expecting the government that broke itself to go out and fix itself. Texan for TEXIT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
....energy is required to make hydrogen and then it needs to be transported to a filling station.
13 posted on 03/23/2020 7:21:38 AM PDT by Red Badger (If people were to God like dogs are to people, the world would be a really great place..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: eartick

We’ll run out of water when they burn up the hydrogen!!!!!!!....................oh, wait.................


14 posted on 03/23/2020 7:22:50 AM PDT by Red Badger (If people were to God like dogs are to people, the world would be a really great place..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
Well, the big issue is putting in the fuel distribution infrastructure for hydrogen. It would actually be easier to have UPS, FedEx and increasingly Amazon Prime delivery trucks switch to compressed natural gas, since natural gas distribution infrastructure has been in place for many decades in most of the USA.
15 posted on 03/23/2020 7:24:09 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's Economic Cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: srmanuel

Yes, they can be recycled......................


16 posted on 03/23/2020 7:26:58 AM PDT by Red Badger (If people were to God like dogs are to people, the world would be a really great place..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

UPS runs quite a few CNGs already. Their local hub here is located very close to the massive Panhandle Eastern pipeline that brings nat gas up from Texas.

I always look to fleets to understand where the true low cost approach lies, unless they are being subsidized by govt to take another approach.

Local transit here purchased a fleet of electric buses last year, but the poor performance (short range) in cold weather led them to switch the next fleet order back to diesels. And it was a warmer than average winter.


17 posted on 03/23/2020 7:31:00 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: srmanuel

The technology does work, was used extensively in the two thousands, but suffers from the fact that you cannot efficiently condense hydrogen denser than a liquid.

To give a fuel cell vehicle a three hundred mile range with liquid hydrogen the fuel tank has to be about the size of a sedan trunk.

You can make hydrogen more dense by forming natural gas, but now you also need a stripper (basically a mini refinery) to remove the hydrogen again for use by the fuel cell)


18 posted on 03/23/2020 7:33:14 AM PDT by MrEdd (Caveat Emptor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Electric vehicles are the cleanest on the road but dirtiest when you consider the total pollution form manufacturing to disposal. What is the total solution form this technology?


19 posted on 03/23/2020 7:34:40 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Before the United States sent its plastics industry to China, we vented eighty percent of the hydrogen needed to replace gasoline to run our vehicles into the atmosphere as waste.


20 posted on 03/23/2020 7:36:06 AM PDT by MrEdd (Caveat Emptor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson