I see the problem.
No, the number of “tested cases” is NOT the number of actual cases. Has no relation. “Tested cases” are dependent on testing. For example: no tests = no cases!
At some point the testing starts. There’s already a pool of cases present so they find many cases quickly. And the more they test the more they find.
So there is a huge growth in the discovery of cases.
But they’re just discovering the pool of cases that was already there. And probably started growing a month ago.
Eventually, of they test enough like SK did, they start iinding fewer cases
The numbers I provide are confirmed cases only.
They are proven because a test proved the person is indeed infected.
For my own curiosity I wanted to know doubling rate of known cases. This started my tracking of the data and even looking ahead.
.
This doubling rate is admittedly, not great news.
However, it is a reasonable indicator to what is in the near future. The rate may, and probably will change or fluctuate and as it does I willl post the real data.