[Kazan]

Dak Prescott will never be the reason a team wins a Super Bowl. He’s a lower top 10 quarterback at best.

[dfwgator]

Dak benefitted from a good offensive line his first few years. Now that OL isn’t nearly as good.

[Oldeconomybuyer]

>>> He’s a lower top 10 quarterback at best. <<<

Totally agree.

[Red Badger]

Dak Prescott will never be the reason a team wins a Super Bowl.

Sure he will. The Eagles won one didn't they?....................

[Tallguy]

“Dak Prescott will never be the reason a team wins a Super Bowl. He’s a lower top 10 quarterback at best.”

But Dak possesses the one trait that you need to win a Superbowl, IMO — durability. Dak can win 12/16 regular season games with this team. Most other teams are lucky to get 12 games out of their starter and then must hope for a split (best case) with the backup.

I’d also rank Dak a bit higher, but we could argue about that.