To: Red Badger
Interesting. In another story it was reported that cats and dogs couldn’t catch it.
2 posted on
02/28/2020 10:14:29 AM PST by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
To: Red Badger
Well that does it! I thought things were going to be ok until this, not even doggies are safe!
3 posted on
02/28/2020 10:14:30 AM PST by
brownsfan
(Behold, the power of government cheese.)
To: Red Badger
Man’s best friend, too? Whatever. We’re in this together.
5 posted on
02/28/2020 10:16:42 AM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Red Badger
That’s good for another 3 percent decline in stocks.
6 posted on
02/28/2020 10:16:59 AM PST by
Mr Ramsbotham
("God is a spirit, and man His means of walking on the earth.")
To: Red Badger
LOL— The dog probably licked its owner’s virus contaminated face.
8 posted on
02/28/2020 10:18:57 AM PST by
House Atreides
(Boycott the NFL 100% — PERMANENTLY)
To: Red Badger
So now they will kill all of their pets!
To: Red Badger
13 posted on
02/28/2020 10:34:46 AM PST by
mewzilla
(Break out the mustard seeds.)
To: Red Badger
Guess he shouldn’t have eaten that human burger that he bought at at McSpot
19 posted on
02/28/2020 10:58:34 AM PST by
Oscar in Batangas
(January 20, 2017, High Noon. The end of an error.)
To: Red Badger
Is “weakly positive” like “kinda pregnant”?
To: Red Badger
“Hong Kong scientists aren’t sure if the dog is actually infected or if it picked up the virus from a contaminated surface”
but that’s good enough for CNBC to add this to their repertoire of “let’s panic america” publications ... with a fake headline that leaves out the word “weakly” ...
23 posted on
02/28/2020 11:42:57 AM PST by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
To: Red Badger
Just great, the dogs will probably strip the shelves at the local Petco soon.
24 posted on
02/28/2020 11:44:40 AM PST by
1Old Pro
To: Red Badger
go figure,, they have been eatin’ dogs for awhile now ..
25 posted on
02/28/2020 12:21:32 PM PST by
ßuddaßudd
((>> M A G A << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
To: Red Badger
What did he win?
26 posted on
02/28/2020 12:23:38 PM PST by
Leep
(Everyday is Trump Day!)
To: Red Badger
It could also be a false positive. The CDC and WHO had to release these test kits very quickly. They have not (to my knowledge) released the statistical process control data on this test. In this case, a false positive will give the patient a scare but monitoring the health will show there is no problem.
Many tests are like this. My youngest granddaughter tested positive for lead exposure in military housing last fall. The good news was that the more expensive, longer, and more reliable test was negative. Sadly, 18 children in military housing on that base tested positive for lead in the more reliable test. The biostatistics folks who monitor these tests work to quantify the problems and improve the test.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson