Why not base it on the value of the vehicle?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Libloather
Why not make the price of everything be based upon income. That way, no matter what you earn, everyone will have the same purchasing power? /s
2 posted on
02/27/2020 3:40:57 AM PST by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: Libloather
I would agree to this, if they determined how much money people could get out of the government based on how much money they paid into it.
3 posted on
02/27/2020 3:41:38 AM PST by
rlmorel
(Finding middle ground with tyranny or evil makes you either a tyrant or evil. Often both.)
To: Libloather
4 posted on
02/27/2020 3:44:00 AM PST by
cdcdawg
(Cornpop was a pony soldier!)
To: Libloather
If they have the technology to do this, they have the technology to base it on the number of offenses instead.
5 posted on
02/27/2020 3:48:03 AM PST by
Opinionated Blowhard
(When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
To: Libloather
6 posted on
02/27/2020 3:49:15 AM PST by
Fresh Wind
(The Electoral College is the firewall protecting us from massive blue state vote fraud.)
To: Libloather
social justice income based parking fines, it works for the justice system why not across the board
To: Libloather
Here comes Santa Clause;
repeat.
9 posted on
02/27/2020 4:06:20 AM PST by
sasquatch
To: Libloather
They should also base them on race. Oh, and dont forget LGBTQ +. And political party too. And..............
10 posted on
02/27/2020 4:09:36 AM PST by
SkyPilot
("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
To: Libloather
Instead of making a decision to pay the penalty or put a meal on the table, make the decision not to violate the law or to not put a meal on the table.
No Soup For Her!

12 posted on
02/27/2020 4:15:42 AM PST by
Cvengr
( Adversity in life & death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
To: Libloather
Isn’t parking where I want to a RIGHT in, like, the Constitution or something?
Right next to where it says I can, like, murder my child two minutes after it’s born?
*SNORT*
14 posted on
02/27/2020 4:32:57 AM PST by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'hobbies.' I'm developing a robust post-Apocalyptic skill set.)
To: Libloather
Let me guess: below a certain income, you pay nothing!
15 posted on
02/27/2020 4:34:05 AM PST by
rbg81
(Truth is stranger than fiction)
To: Libloather
Remember when the Left got upset over the sliding scale bake sale put on by the College Republicans?

16 posted on
02/27/2020 4:47:10 AM PST by
moovova
To: Libloather
So criminals, with no declared income, would be able to park free?
17 posted on
02/27/2020 4:49:23 AM PST by
I want the USA back
(We have sunk to a depth where restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men:Orwell)
To: Libloather
Unconstitutional. A fine is a fine. We are all equal under the law. You can’t charge a person more because they have more money.
It also incentivizes cops to target vehicles that will bring more money to the city. In fact, it will incentivize them to aggressively ticket even when there is no ticketable offense. This happened in Seattle when they were being pressured to write more tickets. A guy got a ticket for leaving his lights on when he parked. He fought it and won, btw. It’s not illegal to leave your headlights on when you park.
19 posted on
02/27/2020 4:53:18 AM PST by
cuban leaf
(The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
To: Libloather
So what, now if you get a parking ticket you have to provide an income statement, an assets statement, both ?
ML/NJ
20 posted on
02/27/2020 5:09:14 AM PST by
ml/nj
To: Libloather
... No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the
equal protection of the laws ...
Sounds like "value" based penalties of law are NOT equal protection.
To: Libloather
So much for equal protection under the law.
23 posted on
02/27/2020 5:21:41 AM PST by
IronJack
To: Libloather
They are not choosing between food and paying fines, they are choosing to park illegally. Poverty is often because of bad choices, parking fines always are.
Subsidizing bad choices is a bad choice.
25 posted on
02/27/2020 5:41:36 AM PST by
American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
To: Libloather
The left is creating a law enforcement system based on revenue enhancement while excusing overt criminal behavior. There is no money in that.
26 posted on
02/27/2020 5:47:54 AM PST by
headstamp 2
(There's a stairway to heaven, but there's also a highway to hell.)
To: Libloather
so low-income families dont have to decide between paying a parking ticket parking illegally or putting food on their table There fixed it.
27 posted on
02/27/2020 6:16:12 AM PST by
super7man
(Madam Defarge, knitting, knitting, always knitting)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson