Posted on 02/25/2020 10:49:58 AM PST by DouglasKC
“flu can kill up to 80,000 americans in a year. But that’s only because there’s a LOT more people infected with various flu viruses.”
So...big picture, which one is more dangerous? (so far)
?
he needs to zip it..did the same thing yesterday
***************************
His staffers need to give him the facts so he doesnt misinterpret the statistics.
Yep. His 99.8% accuracy just went down. He needs to get off his claim.
I don't. Rush keeps using Chinese numbers and then states that the flu has a higher death rate than 2%. This is just flatout wrong.
The death rate for the 1918 Spanish flu was only 1.7%.
I have a “wait and see” attitude about this.
How many on the Japanese cruise ship died? How many of the 14 infected Americans brought back have died? My understanding is that none of them have died. We’ll see.
You’re not the guy that just called him on the air about this are you? Ugh...he took so long to get to the point.
Some of them have died.
Some of them have died.
Koreans are descended from Han Chinese and Japan are closely related and Iran is just close. In any sizable group, there will be people who have genetic markers that are similar to other groups.
It’s possible that the reason why it’s infecting the rest of the world at a slower rate is because the most virulent aspects of this viruses have been contained by the trading of genetic information.
I don’t see it as a problem for myself to be worried about.
Yes now Trump AND rush and everyone everybody here believed word for word forever is now WRONG lol
It doesn’t fit the panicked wuss narrative around here lately :)
Boy for an average age that’s a little closer to retirement around here, the terrified child age is bout 6 :)
I'm not talking about TOTAL DEATHS and neither was Rush. Rush kept saying the DEATH RATE. This is demonstrably false. At the worst (the 1918 Spanish Flu) the death rate was ONLY 1.7% worldwide.
My primary caution on deriving ANY conclusions is that the comparable death rate from Corona virus in the US is frankly unknown (not enough cases to make a statistically significant guess.) Regardless, however, the Corona Virus death rate is highly likely to be significantly less that the world-wide rate primarily because of the state of medical care in the US (best in the world.)
So Rush may be right ... or he may be wrong on the death rate; but he is right that the problem in the US is not the virus, it is the way the media are using it to undermine our President.
No but even that guy overestimated the normal flu. The Spanis flu only killed 2 t0 3% of infected.
How many on the Japanese cruise ship died? How many of the 14 infected Americans brought back have died? My understanding is that none of them have died. Well see.
*****************************************
The last I heard there were 4 deaths of the infected passengers. None of the dead were Americans.
I misread by source about the Spanish flu. IT killed 2% to 3% of those infected. But that was the worst flu EVER. The normal mortality flu rate is much lower.
A Timeline of Media-Inflamed Fears (2000-2017)
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/timeline-media-inflamed-fears-2000-2017/
Rush is wrong, I believe, but not by the tally that Doug states. It defies common sense to believe that if 100,000 people get the flu, only TWO will die.
The normal worldwide mortality rate is less than 1% for influenza. The 1918 Spanish flu killed 2% to 3% of the infected worldwide and that was when healthcare was a lot worse than it is now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.