Posted on 02/17/2020 9:28:57 PM PST by ransomnote
Tranny agenda....
Debasing and mocking what God has created right before our eyes.
Causing division and confusion between the two sexes to subvert the natural continuation of the human race.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I agree. The face gives it away.
heavy
It’s clear Roger Stone got steam rolled by a corrupt compromised deep state judge. She seems to have quite a record for being brought in to take down and punish political opponents even if it’s through their friends and associates.
You are correct. I just went to 8k and nothing is in bold.
Hmmmmm. X22Report always makes a point to say “in brackets and bold”.
This guy gets to drink forever..
ouch
Democrat attorneys don’t use logic, they use feelings.
Debasing and mocking what God has created right before our eyes.
Causing division and confusion between the two sexes to subvert the natural continuation of the human race.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BELOW, MY LONG RESPONSE IS SOCIAL OBSERVATION RE TRANSGENDERING OF OUR SOCIETY.
Yes. The male icons we now are shown are not like the “real men” we grew up with. Granted the “real men” were exaggerated images but we could lat least recognize the behavior and mannerisms in our own fathers, brothers. There are healthy improvements (e.g., men don’t’ have to die of heart attacks or suicide because they “can’t have feelings” or get help etc.) But there is a social neutering that seems to make men ill at ease, and confuses women.
I noticed that modern male “hunks” shown in ads, sports, movies rarely appeal the same way, but I dismissed it because I’m older and “behind the times”. Now “Men” are increasingly portrayed as inherently docile when the effects of testosterone are well known. Many male icons are now “prettier” and more “enlightened” (lack many masculine mannerisms and foibles). The videos I watched all stressed that the NWO doesn’t elevate contenders for stardom unless they embody the newer, softer “male” ideal.
Famous transgender “men” are very hard for me to perceive as genetically women - but there was an interesting video (most of the videos I trained on have been deleted) that focused on the expression in the eyes. Never noticed it before I watched those videos, but there is often an ornamental, “pretty” quality and a diffusely softer, embracing eye contact in women.
In contrast, there is a directness in the eyes of genetic males compared with a generally softer indirectness in the expression of the eyes of women. Maybe others notice that, but I had to study it to see it at all. I read a comment about the statue of David; it said that David has a ‘direct masculine gaze of determination’ and I think that’s what I now can perceive in some transgender icons.
I adapt my expectations more than others in my social circle (their personalities, quirks, appearance, beliefs, mannerisms) and I do it without noticing, so it was hard for me to try to gauge the shift in our modern day icons; I only knew “men” didn’t interest me.
Oddly enough, an outwardly straight acting gay male friend/coworker of mine saw a video of himself recently and “worried” that to him, his mannerism were becoming more noticeably “gay” (he gave an example of the movement of his hand/arm). He asked me if I noticed that change over the course of the 3 years we’d known each other. I explained that I wouldn’t have noticed the subtle drift he was talking about and that overall, I probably just found him “easier to talk to.” I didn’t have a “set point” past which he could not move his arm or tilt his head. The same has been true for me of our social drift - I don’t object to others’ gradual behavior shifts.
There’s directness of gaze in “women” icons that looks very intense and I think men respond to that because they are mistakenly perceiving the desire driven by testosterone. There is a seeking, acquisitiveness not often found in genetic women, and men therefore are more attracted as they believe this lovely “women” is seeking to acquire him sexually. Women notice male attraction to these “strong women”. This eye contact that “women” have drives fashion/makeup trends and social expectations that women will be inherently as direct, demanding, sexually aggressive etc.
I think that strangely, much of the “women’s rights” movement may have been lead by trans NWO types who, though male, found women’s roles unbearable and demanded the right to be at the head of the table at board meetings. I know that I benefit from many freedoms women didn’t have in the past (right to vote, drive a car etc) - I’m just talking about the exaggerated social expectation that women act MUCH more like men or suffer the epithets directed at men who are despised by other men, “weak”, “gutless”, apathetic”.
I like sci-fi and years ago began watch a remake of Battle Star Galactica. While I thought it odd that one of the originally male characters (fighter pilot) was going to be portrayed as a female, I still wanted to watch. But they took that character to masculine extremes. I stopped watching when they had her fist fight her male counterpart. It wasn’t just that she was a fraction of his weight but repeatedly sent him across the room with a mighty punches, it was also that she had a desire to hit someone, one that she supposedly cared for, to “make her point” and “settle a score” etc. The series portrayed them as two warring males, one of whom weighed 100lbs, who appeared to be hitting each other to establish dominance and respect which I couldn’t comprehend (I wondered if my age was showing). I found it painful and sad to watch that episode when I was supposed to find it “exciting”. I don’t own a television and rarely watch anything modern online/movies.
Many modern women believe that men/women have identical needs for respect and achievement (identical and not similar) and surprisingly, young women actually believe that the physical disparity in size and strength between women and men is not a factor when judging which of them will triumph in hand to hand combat. Instead, (too) many believe a difference in resolution to win/survive determines the outcome which I believe is a social construct common to men (e.g., pre Captain America “treatment” the scrawny man will physically fight a much larger man despite inury, saying only, “I could do this all day.)
Ironically, this element of social program distorts the area in which women and men can be similar (e.g., fight to the death for their children, give up everything for God etc.)
There was a news story of a woman who fought a mountain lion barehanded to save her children, one of whom was seriously injured. She was barely breathing when she was found bleeding out. When roused her only question before dying was “Are my children alive?” But the NWO social agenda would have us believe that she lived her life with inherently masculine personality traits, mannerisms aspirations AND physical capacity which allowed her to save her children.
This is the social side of the Satanic doctrine of opposites. Looking back at old black and white pictures of European royalty and American socialites (and wives of presidents), it’s absurdly obvious that plenty of the “women” didn’t look like women. Large brawny men stooping in heeled shoes, clutching a hand bag in that strange way men in drag effect (primly between thumb and forefinger in front of their navel). History, before The Great Awakening.
This is an important video by George Webb that deserves to be watched and distributed widely in order to exonerate Roger Stone.
Roger Stone defense- the unseen evidence.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gmTpU0U8QQe
But maybe Pence has done adequate “Penance” by now. Clearly POTUS has known all about this incident (of October 2016) for a long time.
Pence is admired by Trump’s single most powerful base of supporters, the Evangelicals.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I believe Pence has been left in place and not exposed in order to protect stability. President Trump would be less likely to win 2020 if his actions to repair the government collapsed it. I think Pence was a requirement of GOP support for Trump to win 2016 and he HAD to win. I think he has not been exposed to the Q public much because overall, how many would sleep well knowing the VP wants to crush, remove the president?
We saw Pence receive an envelop and Bush Sr’s funeral. And that’s really all we “needed” to know at the time. Q could have shown us more but what is gained by us if we believe someone close to the president is untrustworthy. The fact that it’s surfacing now, I believe, means more that will rock public perception is about to be revealed anyway. So he’s posed as being “on the ticket” for 2020 and gives talks posted on Whitehouse.gov, and which I HATE to post but sometimes do thinking it might have info useful to some.
I think it’s less likely a carrot (help us an allay your guilt) and more of a stick (do this or every aspect of every crime will be punished to maximum levels). But that’s just my 2 cents.
Between BLOOMBERG’S and OPRA’S “generosity”, all poverty in America could ended.
“ If Operation Mockingbird is a CIA operation, which I believe it is, why can’t the President order it to cease?”
Plus, the CIA has not only tons of unspent funding squirreled away, they have mountains of cash from their other enterprises, such as opium trafficking, all off the books.
What I suspect is happening right now, is the good guys are monitoring absolutely everything, actively identifying and eliminating swamp dwellers by the hundreds. We’ve heard about big names, but there has to be plenty of minions/flunkies as well.
that photo is photoshopped.
The angel model is Doutzen (Doetzen?) Kroes from the annual Victoria’s Secret fashion show at Earls Court, Dec. 2, 2014 in London.
guessing not a guy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doutzen_Kroes
A better question is “If Operation Mockingbird is CURRENTLY a CIA operation...?
What is OpMock is no longer a CIA supported operation and is being run by a disassociated ex-operator, like, say, Davey Brooks?
me: I believe this is both Baphomet worship and an attempt to indoctrinate, because the public is being trained that the image of desirability is Baphomet. By that I mean, show men scantily clad “women” until their desire adjusts to that slightly off presentation of “women”, and then reveal tot hem that they are desiring a genetic male, and then work to lower their resistance ot the thought of desiring males because their perceptions have been trained thus.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I forgot the aspect that women are being trained to desire trans “men”. When surveyed about what both sexes find attractive in the opposite sex, men’s lists start with breasts, hips and women’s lists start with “friendly eyes.” So trans “men” icons (models, actors, etc.) have the feminine friendly embracing gaze of genetic females in the stature of a male. Women are really flattered and encouraged to trust that feminized gaze (looks less threatening, aqressive etc.) and at the same time are being socialized through programming to view traditonal masculinity as rampaging violence and disgust of emotions or caring. Hence we get “toxic masculinity” ‘educational materials’ in school and programming.
Strangely Satanic - encouraging people to seek their comforts - the sexes are being encouraged not to tolerate natural differences in men and women because they don’t have to; men can socialize with “women” who look them over with an sexually aggressive glance and women can socialize with “men” whom they find understand (prioritize) so much of women’s concerns and are not aggressive or threatening.
enlightening. thanx
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.